I wrote this piece last year when the Guardian published its first story about the Panama Papers, but if you substitute the word ‘Paradise’ for ‘Panama’ it could just as easily apply to today’s Guardian splash about the use by the Queen’s private estate of an offshore tax shelter in the Cayman Islands. If anything, this takes the Guardian’s hypocrisy to new heights. After all, the Queen is not legally obliged to pay income tax – she is a voluntary tax payer – so this could not be described as tax avoidance by any conceivable definition of the term, whereas the Guardian Media Group is obliged to pay tax and therefore its use of an offshore tax shelter in the Cayman Islands to avoid paying any tax on the £302 million in profit it realised from the sale of Auto Trader in 2008 was straightforward tax avoidance.
Needless to say, today’s Guardian contains a tub-thumping editorial by its head of investigations that calls for ‘greater transparency’ about ‘the tapestry of schemes and networks’ that ‘many ordinary people find offensive and unfair’. This ‘transparency’ does not extend to the Guardian’s own tax arrangements. So tax-avoiding newspaper ‘exposes’ 91-year-old woman for financially benefitting from exactly the same tax arrangements that it uses and which all of its employees have benefitted from, including Jeremy Corbyn’s Communications Chief. Off with her head, eh comrades?
- ‘I’m literally a communist’ T-shirt – literally free market economics Steerpike 17 July 2018
- Theresa May’s Brexit fear is selling Britain short David Green 19 July 2018
- I’ll vote for Theresa, but only if she passes these three tests Toby Young 7 July 2016
- David Miliband’s never-to-be-made best man speech Toby Young 30 March 2011
- The Public Accounts Committee report is pure Labour propaganda Toby Young 26 April 2017
- Stupid is as stupid votes Toby Young 21 May 2017