Dominic Cummings is the man drafted in to put together the putative No campaign for the EU referendum. Cummings has a tendency to surprise and he has done that today with a piece that pushes the idea that the No campaign should say that there would be a second referendum if Britain votes Out. This second vote would be on the terms of Britain’s exit from the EU.
Cummings’ thinking is that this would de-risk voting No. People would be simply rejecting the deal that David Cameron had negotiated rather than voting to leave outright.
Cummings sums up the advantages of a second referendum for No thus:
This approach might allow NO to dodge its biggest problem – the idea that a NO vote is a vote to leave in one jump and is therefore a leap in the dark. It would allow NO to portray YES as the truly risky option. This approach would enable NO to build a coalition between a) those who think we should just leave (about a third) and b) those who dislike the EU but are worried about leaving (about a third) and who may be persuaded that ‘Cameron’s deal is bad and we should try to get a better one but the only way to force this is to vote NO’.
Politically, I can see how this would help the No campaign in the first referendum. It would also make it easier to put together a coalition of those who don’t like individual aspects of the Cameron deal. For instance, one could see trade unions being more inclined to back a No vote if they knew it wasn’t actually a vote to leave.
Cummings’ intervention today is a reminder that despite trailing badly in the polls, the No campaign is beginning to pull itself together and still has a few shots left in its locker. It is also worth noting that Charles Moore floated this idea of two referendums in the last issue of The Spectator.
Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.