I wrote earlier that the immigration debate can bite back — and it’s already
done just that. Speaking this morning, Vince Cable has labeled the Prime Minister’s speech as "very
unwise," and at risk of "inflaming extremism." That, lest it need saying, is the same Vince Cable who’s a member of Cameron’s government.
In theoretical terms, what this clarifies is the parameters of the Coalition
Agreement. While almost every policy that Cameron highlights in his speech is part of that document, it seems that the Lib Dems don’t have to agree with the way he sells them. The point is
being made, this morning, that the idea of reducing net migration to its 1980s levels is very much, and
very specifically, a Tory ambition.
But it’s the politics of the situation that are considerably more intriguing. We know that we have entered a "new phase" of the coalition, where both sides more readily define themselves against
each other — and understandably so. But this is still surprisingly acidic stuff from Cable. The question now is whether he might be overstepping the mark, or whether it’s a sign of real
breakdown in intra-coalition relations.
In any case, Cable’s intervention is hardly going to endear him to those Tories who thought he should be forcefully retired after his unwitting Murdoch gaffe. It may be spring, but the bloom
appears to be fading from the Rose Garden.