X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House US Election

Trump’s performance will have delighted Putin

11 January 2017

6:48 PM

11 January 2017

6:48 PM

After 167 days without a press conference, Donald Trump’s performance in Trump Tower didn’t disappoint. He abused journalists, denounced a string of media organisations and compared his own intelligence services with those of Nazi Germany.

Some of us wondered whether the latest scandal – allegations that Russian intelligence operatives had gathered compromising material or Kompromat on the President-elect  – would force Trump to tread carefully, or even cancel his scheduled appointment with the assembled press corps at Trump Tower.

Of course that’s not his style. He was in full combat mode as he answered questions about what he gets up to in Moscow hotel rooms, lambasting the media that published the unverified document and throwing in a gag – ‘Does anyone really believe that story? I’m also very much of a germaphobe, by the way. Believe me.’

He rounded on his own intelligence agencies. In blistering language he blamed them for the release of the document and reopening his running feud with the people he will need to work with next week when he is sworn in as president. ‘I think it’s a disgrace,’ he said. ‘And I say that is something that Nazi Germany would have done.’


Although his refusal to answer a Buzzfeed reporter’s question will anger liberals, there is a whole other world beyond New York that will nod their heads. How could a media organisation publish such salacious details without any verification? How could it put such salacious documents – gathered by a former intelligence officer on behalf of Trump’s opponents – online without knowing whether or not they were true? That offered Trump a very open goal. ‘It’s all fake news. It’s phoney stuff. It did not happen,’ was his response.

Yet there are other elements of the dossier that may prove less easily to deny and more problematic to Trump once the bluster has faded and we look again at the transcript of the press conference. The new dossier alleges a back-and-forth of information between Trump surrogates and intermediaries. And it spells out the apparent motives of Putin’s regime in targeting the property billionaire years before his political ambitions took him to the White House. ‘Its aim was to sow discord and disunity both within the US itself but more especially in the transatlantic alliance which was viewed as inimicable to Russian interests,’ said the dossier. 

When Trump was asked specifically about whether any of his campaign team was in touch with Moscow he segued straight into an answer about alleged Russian hacking of the Democrat campaign. ‘He shouldn’t be doing it,’ he said about Putin. ‘He won’t be doing it. Russia will have much greater respect for our country when I’m leaving it then when other people have let it. You will see that. Russia will respect our country more.’ When he was asked about contacts between his campaign team and Russia, a government that apparently attempted to interfere with the outcome of the election, he avoided the question. If there is a smoking gun, that’s where it lies.

And meanwhile, while the allegations swirl, while Trump fends off questions about Moscow hotel rooms and feuds with his own intelligence agencies, Putin must be growing more and more happy with his pick for US president.


Freddy Gray and Paul Wood discuss whether Donald Trump is an agent of Russian influence:

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close