X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

What the papers say: Donald Trump hits back

12 January 2017

8:42 AM

12 January 2017

8:42 AM

Donald Trump is dominating the headlines once again after he hit back furiously at reports that Russia had compromising videos of him in a Moscow hotel room. The president-elect denied the claims, branding BuzzFeed, who revealed the dossier detailing the allegations, a ‘failing piece of garbage’. So should the claims have come to light?

No, says the Sun, which attacks the website for publishing the unverified allegations and in so doing making a ‘mockery of journalism’. The paper questions why the website – whose editor-in-chief admitted they could not stand up the claims – gave the go-ahead to release the information anyway. Contrasting it with attempts to ‘strangle British newspapers with State regulation’, it says that ‘anarchy reigns on the web’. Elsewhere, the newspaper also finds room to have its say on Mark Carney’s appearance at a select committee yesterday, in which the Bank of England governor said that Brexit was no longer the biggest danger facing the UK economy. Given that Carney’s prophecies from before the referendum haven’t come to light yet, says the Sun, perhaps this change of tune means that ‘we ARE doomed’ after all.


What should we make of Donald Trump’s fiery outing in front of the press yesterday? The Times says there is clearly a good reason why the president-elect has waited six months to make an appearance in front of the world’s media; after all, his critics have ‘plenty of topics on which to ask him potentially embarrassing questions’. One of these topics – and the one on everyone’s lips – is Russia’s alleged links to Donald Trump. However far these ties do actually go, Trump hasn’t been embarrassed to talk up Putin. So it’s obvious than that we’re going to see something of a departure in terms of US relations with the Kremlin. This news has worried many. But is there a hidden positive to closer ties between the two countries? The Times suggests that Trump’s closer links with Putin could even mirror President Nixon’s olive branch to China 45 years ago. This move, the paper suggests, could enable the US to ‘drive a wedge between Russia and China and free up Washington to concentrate on winning a show of strength with Beijing’. But if the plan is to annoy China, Trump should be careful. The Times says that American and Chinese economies are woven inextricably together and ‘they should not be lightly pulled apart’.

But what about the man Donald Trump is replacing? Barack Obama gave an emotional farewell speech on Monday night in which he detailed his legacy. What legacy, asks the Daily Mail, which says Obama is lucky there has been such a row about Donald Trump because it has distracted from ‘just how little he has to brag about after eight years in power’. Guantanamo Bay is open, Obama’s ‘empty threats’ against Syria will linger long in the memory, and his ‘disgraceful’ interference in the Brexit referendum with his remarks about Britain going to the back of the queue for a trade deal will also not be forgotten. But he has left behind a kind of political inheritance – ‘America’s disenchantment with its liberal elite – and the triumph of Mr Trump’.

There are some who will be glad to see the back of Barack Obama – Benjamin Netanyahu among them, says the Guardian. The paper says that Trump’s choice for ambassador to Israel -David Friedman – and the president elect’s son-in-law and Middle East adviser Jared Kushner – will be welcomed by Netanyahu. But there are big worries about the path Israel is now taking, says the paper, which talks of an ‘accelerating rightward trend’ whereby the West Bank occupation comes to be seen as permanent. The paper warns that the direction being taken by the Israeli Prime Minister looks like a worrying one. And Trump’s small interventions so far – such as his apparent endorsement of the decision to move the US embassy to Jerusalem – are also worrying. Such a move by Trump ‘would be a disaster for peace’, the Guardian says.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close