X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Squeeze are wrong: the Tories are hellbent on fixing welfare, not destroying it

10 January 2016

2:33 PM

10 January 2016

2:33 PM

Squeeze were at their best in the 1970s, and this morning demonstrated that their political ideas haven’t much evolved from that awful decade. Playing out the Andrew Marr show in front of the Prime Minister, Glenn Tilbrook changed the lyrics of this latest song to insert the line “I grew up in council houses, they’re part of what made Britain great. But there are some people who are hellbent on destruction of the welfare state.” Not quite. Today’s Conservative Party is hellbent on reforming the welfare state – so it helps people out of poverty rather than traps them in it. That is what’s behind today’s news that the PM is minded to knock down the worst estates, rebuild the property and help rebuild the lives of the tenants.

Let’s take a better protest song: Jerusalem. Blake famously wrote about England’s ‘dark, satanic mills’ – the scourge, as he saw it, of British society. The closest equivalent today is sink housing estates, with mass worklessness and high levels of criminality. Children growing up with no role models:- pitifully few workers around, pitifully few fathers at home. Estates where you can’t find any fresh fruit or vegetables to buy, but the off-license and the betting shop are always close at hand. Estates where you see syringes cast in doorways, and gangs often represent the surest economic route to success. The kind of place that a teenager might be taken (as Tilbrook once put it) “from bar to street to bookie’”. And worse.

In his speech tomorrow (the text of which has been previewed in today’s papers) Cameron will talk about the warmth inside the doors of in council estates. I used to live on one, and was grateful to be there: safe, affordable accommodation in the jungle of dodgy-landlord accommodation. Not so good to have various human deposits staining the lift, but it’s a mistake to see all council estates as welfare ghettoes. In fact, as a result of the recent rise in employment, a clear majority of social housing tenants are in work.

[Alt-Text]


But there is nothing compassionate about denying the extent of the social decay in the worst schemes. This is what happened during Labour years: the problem was ignored and the people living inside such places were abandoned – until, latterly, pioneering Labour reformers like John Hutton and James Purnell started the work now being taken on by the Tories. How much easier to keep writing welfare cheques and leave such people to decay in edge-of-town estates, economically isolated from the rest of society. No one accuses you of trying to bring ‘destruction’ if you leave these places to fester. The Conservatives have, under Cameron and Iain Duncan Smith, switched to a policy which aims to leaveno one left beind: no group deemed too expensive or tricky to try and help. It’s a risky strategy, with obloquy guaranteed. It means (for example) assessing all 2m people on incapacity benefit for what work they can do – knowing what an undertaking this will be, and how difficult it is to do properly. They are also replacing the notorious benefits trap with a new system, Universal Credit, which better rewards work.

I’ve long been in favour taking a hammer to the worst estates, and instead allowing parents to move to more mixed areas with better schools, safer communities and shinier prospects. But make no mistake: any idiot can knock down housing estates (as the 1960s proved) – it’s far harder to create places where people flourish. That will be Cameron’s next step. But the mission isn’t destroying welfare; it’s the destruction of poverty.

PS This graph shows who has seen their income drop the most so far under Cameron…

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close