X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

Google obeys tax laws, and gives us awesome services for free. Why complain?

23 January 2016

12:06 PM

23 January 2016

12:06 PM

If Google hoped for some good PR in offering £130 million to settle UK tax claims dating back to the Labour years, it was a miscalculation: Labour regards the offer as “derisory” and the BBC is leading its news bulletins the better to sock it to its rival. Why did Google bother? It has run up against the standard anti-business narrative: that the social worth of businesses can be measured only by how much cash they give to the government. In fact, Google provides its services to millions of Britons (worth at least £11 billion, by some estimates) at no cost at all: this is its contribution to society. As for its contribution to the government’s coffers, Google has – from the offset – been following the rules. And for this, it has been lambasted.

It ought to come as no surprise that paying tax has been revolutionised in an electronic, borderless environment world. And yet an awful lot of people are in a constant state of shock that taxpayers adapt. As we have seen with Google, Apple – and even pop groups like U2, fronted by Saint Bono, which moved part of its business to the Netherlands for tax reasons. As Bono explained:-

It’s just some smart people we have working for us trying to be sensible about the way we’re taxed

Google has also hired smart people to plan its tax exposure. The fact that governments, including our own, are still using the term ‘tax avoidance’ shows how little they have understood the issue. We’re in an era of tax competition: governments need to compete for people. And they do. Why is George Osborne offering the lowest corporation tax in the G20? Why is he boasting about his restraint on taxing overseas profits? To try to tempt big companies away from Ireland and other lower-tax countries.


Quite properly, any government will investigate and prosecute companies who break the rules. But if the tax system is addled with loopholes, can it really blame a company — or a stand-up comedian — that (legally) takes advantage of them?

And, anyway, companies can’t pay tax: only people can. Osborne’s steady reduction of corporation tax to 20pc has left companies with more money to hire workers and keep prices low. His policy just might just be related to Britain having zero inflation and record employment.

Google’s contribution to the UK economy is so big that there are serious worries about it screwing up the GDP figures: we’re all paying nothing for hugely valuable digital products and nothing shows up in the economic output. Google’s popularity has made it very powerful – too powerful for my liking. A lot depends on its good behaviour which is, perhaps, why its tax arrangements cause such interest. But the general principle holds: if you don’t like the tax rules, then it’s best to change the rules – rather than blame companies for following them.


Show comments
Close