X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Spectator Health

How self-testing can help beat cervical cancer

21 August 2014

10:59 AM

21 August 2014

10:59 AM

Self-testing is now available to any individual wishing to rule out conditions such as diabetes, pregnancy and bowel cancer.

Traditionally, however, screening for cervical cancer has required women to attend a GP surgery in order to have a small sample of cells scraped from the surface of their cervix by a doctor or a nurse. The sample is then sent to a laboratory to assess the cervical cells for any abnormalities (cytology testing) and/or to test for human papilloma virus (HPV) DNA.  Some types of HPV may cause cervical abnormalities that can subsequently go on to develop into cervical cancer. Several studies over the past decade have also demonstrated the superiority of HPV DNA testing over cytology.

Around 20 per cent of women do not attend cervical screening for a number of reasons including, for example, difficulties relating to travel, childcare, work commitments and problems in accessing screening at an appropriate time and place. Others are put off by the potential embarrassment and discomfort of the whole process.

[Alt-Text]


But all that could be about to change. Important work undertaken in both China and Mexico over recent years has highlighted the potential of self-sampling for HPV DNA. In some recently published research on 100,242 Mexican women aged 25-75 and from low-income backgrounds, 11% (10,863) self-tested positive for HPV DNA.

In a study due to be completed later this month women attending five surgeries in London have been offered the option of self-testing for HPV using a swab. The self-sampling can be undertaken at the individual’s home as opposed to at the GP surgery.

In addition a separate analysis of 36 studies comparing the accuracy of HPV DNA testing on self-collected samples in comparison to clinician-collected samples has been published. Form this it seems that self-sampling can be as good as sampling by a doctor or a nurse if the subsequent DNA analytical method is of a sufficiently high quality.

Cervical cancer remains the most common cancer in women under the age of 35 years and the last decade has seen an increase in rates amongst younger women. Perhaps offering more convenient and acceptable approaches to cervical screening might help to reverse this trend.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close