X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Coffee House

Ed Miliband’s union bosses would change Britain for the worse

31 July 2014

3:40 PM

31 July 2014

3:40 PM

Trade unions have an important role in any decent society, but their stranglehold on the Labour Party is something we must fight against.

I will never forget walking the streets of Poland back in 1981, when martial law was in force, and there were armed soldiers on almost every street corner. There it was a trade union, Solidarity, which brought authoritarian Communism to its knees.

In the UK Margaret Thatcher recognised the importance of trade unions in society. Indeed one of her first roles in politics was as chairman of Dartford Conservative Trade Unionists.

But the battle in British politics today is nothing to do with the work done by local union officials or workers struggling for political freedom. Instead it is about the personal ambitions of a small group of union bosses who want to change our country in pursuit of inefficient spending and a larger, ineffective state.

The union bosses want a Britain where hardworking taxpayers are left to foot the bill for unaffordable welfare systems. A Britain where borrowing more and more is the norm and not something we want to stop. Borrowing which, under Labour, would produce more debt than future generations could ever afford to repay. A Britain where entrepreneurship is stifled, not encouraged.

[Alt-Text]


And it is Ed Miliband and the Labour Party who want to walk through the doors of Number 10 to deliver all this. Never has the Labour Party been so reliant on union support. Unite alone has donated more than £12 million since 2010 – that’s nearly a third of all Labour’s donations.  Miliband himself and most of his team have been bankrolled by thousands and thousands of pounds from Len McCluskey.

As Len McCluskey himself has said: ‘I’m as keen as anyone, as you’ve probably noticed, on debating Labour policy. But I want to have those debates with Ed Miliband in Number 10, not in opposition.’

The trouble is it won’t be just debates. Of the Labour candidates selected for this General Election, over a third have close ties to McCluskey’s union Unite. And if Ed Miliband were to enter Downing Street, he would be entirely dependent on their votes in the House of Commons.

So when Len McCluskey demands something – Ed Miliband gives in to him. Scrapping the benefit cap. Public ownership of the railways. A tax on the family home. Old fashioned rent controls that won’t work. The restoration of the spare room subsidy. All demanded by Len McCluskey – and all granted in turn by Ed Miliband.

They are policies that would risk Britain’s future. And they come with a price tag. Treasury estimates show that Labour plan to borrow £166 billion more than the Conservatives if they were to win the next election. That equates to £5,500 per head for every taxpayer in the country. It is an agenda that Britain cannot afford.

Last week we had some good news. Our economy has grown back to pre-recession levels. Employment is at its highest ever level with over 2 million more jobs since 2010.  We have made good progress, but there is still a long way to go.

So the choice at the next election is clear: between our long-term economic plan that offers real results, and Ed Miliband’s union bosses and their promises of higher deficits, higher taxes and rising insecurity. It’s a battle we have to win.

Chris Grayling is Secretary of State for Justice and Conservative MP for Epsom and Ewell.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close