X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

Nick Clegg is setting out what the Lib Dems stand for

16 June 2014

12:32 PM

16 June 2014

12:32 PM

What is Nick Clegg up to? He held a press conference today to tell us that his party’s manifesto will be a Lib Dem manifesto, not a manifesto aimed at a partnership with Labour or the Tories. And he announced that his party will ring-fence education spending for two-to-19-year-olds in the next Parliament. The Liberal Democrat leader told the assembled hacks that Britain needed to move from ‘austerity to ambition’, another fortune cookie phrase presumably cooked up by whoever thought ‘Alarm Clock Britain’ made sense. Clegg said:

‘As we look towards 2015, it’s clear to me that Britain doesn’t want or need simply more of the same. The Conservative party will tell you everything is fine, let’s just carry on down the tramlines of permanent austerity. But once the books are balanced, as they must be and will be if Liberal Democrats are in government, in my view it would be wrong to carry on with austerity as usual. Britain doesn’t need more of the same, it needs a new wave of energy, optimism and, quite simply Liberalism. Liberal Democrats will put forward in 2015 a responsible manifesto: as I set out last week we have a responsible plan to eradicate the deficit and set a course to bring debt down. But acting responsibly is not the same as carrying on regardless of changing circumstances. Labour claim to want to change, of course, but until they come forward with a coherent plan to deal with Britain’s fiscal problems they’re just whistling in the wind, they won’t be taken seriously. The way I see it is this: if this Parliament was about repairing the British economy, the next parliament is about rewiring it. If the last Parliament was about rescue, the next must be about renewal. Rescue to renewal. That’s why we need to move from austerity to ambition.’

Clegg is setting up what the Conservatives will argue is a false dichotomy between spending cuts and empowering people: his Coalition partners will argue that a smaller state does not exclude ambition, it enables it. But Clegg is setting out a marker that the Lib Dems don’t believe in the hefty Labourish state, nor in ‘rolling back the state’ (possibly one of the more misused phrases of recent times): they believe in a medium-sized, ‘enabling state’.

[Alt-Text]


That the Deputy Prime Minister is extending the ring-fence around education spending so that it covers ‘cradle to college’ might not be a commitment to a medium-sized state if he then produces spending cuts that fund it. Or it might be less ideological than that: the party’s pollster Ryan Coetzee has examined voters’ responses to detailed policy propositions, and the most positively received will crop up in speeches and announcements over the next few months.

But what is interesting is Clegg’s continuing commitment to ring-fencing when his colleague Vince Cable has described the practice as an ‘unbalanced approach to public spending’ which is ‘not very sensible’ in the long-term. Before the 2010 election, he said ‘there can be no ring-fencing if we are serious about getting the public finances back on track’. Perhaps this is another sign that the Business Secretary is being shuffled away from his current role as the Liberal Democrats’ economy lead.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close