X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

Mental health: Government’s commitment doesn’t match its rhetoric

24 June 2014

4:53 PM

24 June 2014

4:53 PM

Professor Sue Bailey, the outgoing President of the Royal College of Psychiatry, has described mental health services in England as a ‘car crash’. Although the language may be alarmist Professor Bailey’s concerns deserve to be taken seriously by all those who care about mental health provision in our country.

The truth is that while politicians are much more comfortable talking about mental health than ever before, too often the ambitious rhetoric is ahead of the reality. Of most concern is the decision by NHS England, set against a background of pledged ‘parity of esteem’, to set the price deflator for mental health and community trusts at 1.8 per cent compared to 1.5 per cent for acute hospital trusts. These variations sound small but they make a considerable difference. Naturally, there are sound arguments for driving efficiencies into the NHS but, in common with the past thirty plus years, these are hitting mental health services harder, which are already starting from a lower funding base. Indeed, NHS England’s decision and the seeming impotence of government to challenge that decision is a perfect example of why we need more politics in the NHS and not less. It defies credibility that we in government and parliament think it is a good idea to abrogate responsibility for £100 billion of taxpayers’ money. Our elected representatives and democratic institutions are meant to ensure that publicly funded bodies are accountable to those that they serve; in the case of the NHS we have deliberately lost sight of this.

[Alt-Text]


At a more granular level, the closure of mental health beds over the past decade is now giving cause for real concern. Looking after people in the community is a wholly desirable aspiration but there will always be occasions when someone is so ill that he or she will need to be cared for in a specialist setting, near their family and friends. Sadly, it remains too often the case that people are transported up to two or three hundred miles from their home in search of a bed. Not just adults but children too. This is simply unacceptable and must stop now. I recently chaired an event at the House of Commons and learnt of one family, unable to secure a hospital bed, being offered a place at a young offenders’ institution for their disturbed and distressed son. Understandably, the family refused this offer.

But it is not all doom and gloom. In my own county of Hertfordshire, we have an enlightened mental health trust and new facilities are being opened. Also, like so many other parts of the country, we are blessed with fantastic mental health professionals. We need to value them and their work. My concern is that this is not always the case. The recent decision around the payment or, as it turned out to be, the non-payment of the 1 per cent pay increase was a managerial error of judgement. It created bad feeling at a time when our political energies would have been better focused on building morale.

Charles Walker is Conservative MP for Broxbourne

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close