X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Cameron should stop the Tory wars – or send for the man who can

7 June 2014

8:06 PM

7 June 2014

8:06 PM

Modern Conservatives seem to be allergic to success. Every time things are going right, the party spasms. Sir John Major’s government nurtured a remarkable economic recovery, yet was beaten after its infighting appalled voters. In opposition, David Cameron acquired a habit of blowing opinion poll leads — a habit he did not, alas, shake off in time for the general election. And now, just as a Conservative victory at the next election looks likely, war has broken out again. What should have been a day of success for Michael Gove has ended in his being forced to apologise for briefing against officials in Theresa May’s department. And the Home Secretary, for her part, has lost a valued and highly effective special adviser: Fiona Cunningham.

The feuding between Gove and May is, in part, a problem of success. Gove has proven to be a radical, reforming Education Secretary; he has arguably achieved more than anyone else in government. Ms May can claim to be the most consequential Home Secretary in modern times: she has taken controllable immigration (i.e., from outside Europe) to its lowest level in 16 years and recorded crime to its lowest in 25 years, and all on a budget that’s the lowest it has been in ten years. Her recent confrontation of the Police Federation showed her at the height of her powers.

Both ministers like to fight, and both like to win. But when they fight each other, the Conservative Party loses. Mr Gove’s views on Islamism are well known: he once wrote a book, Celsius 7/7, against the appeasement of fundamentalists. Ms May’s determination is also legendary: she likes to work until 2 a.m. identifying and eliminating problems (and enemies). The deportation of Abu Qatada was her most high-profile success, and at times it seems as if she’d like to send Gove on the next flight to Jordan. He likes to offer his views; she tends to regard any interference with her department as an act of aggression — even on relatively innocent issues such as Chinese visas, which was of concern to the Treasury.

The Education Department and the Home Office have been behaving like autonomous government agencies, and it’s easy to see why. Under Cameron, No. 10 has become a coalition reconciliation service, rather than a centre of government. Cameron’s aides act as regularly for Nick Clegg as for the Prime Minister himself. Cameron does not attempt to dictate government from the centre. This is to his credit. But he has spent (and wasted) so much time keeping Liberal Democrats happy that he has neglected his own party.

The Conservatives intend to fight the next election by parading their competence — which will be difficult enough, especially when it comes to issues like government finances. But more Tory feuding may fatally undermine Cameron’s claim to be the most stable force in British politics. Such episodes are just careless, and fatal to the overall Tory message.

Yet we can expect more because there is no one in No10 – other than Cameron – who was capable of sorting this out because there is no one sufficiently respected by either May or Gove.  As it stands, No10 is viewed by both the Education Dept and the Home Office with something approaching cordial contempt – it’s seen as a coalition relationship reconciliation unit. Both Gove and May believed their achievements have come by their ignoring No10’s occasional phone calls – normally asking a favour on behalf of Nick Clegg, or worrying that their reforms would be open to challenge under some EU directive or another). And broadly speaking, they’re right.

Coalition has deformed No10, and made in into a coalition love nest. Those atop No10 work for the coalition, rather than the Tories. So there’s no one to coordinate the Tories – other than the PM himself, who is too busy. This  is yet another example of a problem that Lynton Crosby would have solved more quickly, or even nipped in the bud, if he was moved from Tory HQ and put into No10, in effect, as a Chief of Tory Staff.

That two powerful and effective cabinet members could be at war with each other, dripping poisonous quotes to the press on the day of the Queen’s Speech, reveals an worrying lack of discipline. The tendency towards omnishambles has not gone away. And it’s not confined to No10: why did George Osborne allow Treasury aides to tell Scots that the union was worth ‘10 weeks worth of chips and mushy peas’ as if they were addressing tartan untermensch? Did he see that advert? Approve it? Thoughtless, outrageous slips like this can lose a country. Allowing needless war between your two best-performing ministers can mean that voters see the shambles, not the achievement.

Cameron was right to act tonight – but, to be frank, it’s his fault that things grew so out of hand. This Gove vs May feud has exposed a lack of prime ministerial grip – which is why the PM has had to act tonight. The election is on a knife-edge: if he gets everything right between now and next June then he can win. He just can’t afford any more of these unforced errors. It’s time to take Crosby from the cramped, badly-ventilated Tory Party HQ and take him into No10, with a brief of making sure that these slips don’t happen again.

This is an extended version of the leading article in this week’s Spectator


Show comments
Close