Coffee House

Gove uses urgent question on free schools to trumpet his achievements

12 May 2014

4:47 PM

12 May 2014

4:47 PM

Even though the row over free schools has nothing to do with the Labour party, it took a reasonable bet that it would benefit from joining the fray by asking an urgent question on the allegation that Michael Gove diverted £400 million from basic need funding to the free schools project.

In the Commons this afternoon, Tristram Hunt accused the Education Secretary of lacking ‘self-control and focus’ and paying for ‘pet political projects in expensive, half-empty, underperforming free schools’. He demanded that Gove confirm that he did indeed re-allocate this funding, asked him to accept the National Audit Office figures showing free school places had been allocated outside of areas of need, asked why the free school programme had been so heavily weighted towards secondary schools when there was a shortage of primary places, and argued that Gove’s leadership of his department was ‘spiralling out of control’.


What came next was a masterclass in how to destroy an opposition, regardless of how valid the questions being levelled by Hunt and co were. Every time a Labour MP rose to ask a question or complain about the way their local authority schools were being treated relative to local free schools, Gove launched into a paen that either highlighted the runaway success of a local free school, that member’s support for local free schools, or a local campaign from parents or football clubs to set up a free school. Most of the hour passed in this way, with Gove essentially press releasing his programme’s achievements, and dodging all the difficult questions the Labour MPs levelled at him.

He also teased Hunt for holding ‘more contorted positions on free schools than some of the Indian sex manuals I can name’.

What looked like a good piece of Opposition-craft from Labour didn’t end up that way at all. It just showed how wily Gove is, and how well-briefed he was before entering the Chamber. If the free schools programme needs to be scrutinised and its architects held to account, then we shall have to wait for another day for that to happen.

As for whether this row worked out for the Liberal Democrats today, well, David Laws chose to stay away from the urgent question. A departmental source explained afterwards that the Liberal Democrat schools minister was having ‘meetings inside the department and elsewhere’ and that the Secretary of State was aware Laws wouldn’t be there. Handy for Gove, as it meant he could steamroller his way through that hour without any Coalition colleague grimacing next to him. But handy for the Lib Dems that they want to make noises off to the newspapers yet avoid the Chamber? That depends on whether you think the party wants coalitions to appear to be a success. On the basis of this weekend’s sniping and the silence of the schools minister today, they don’t think unity on school reform is a price worth paying to give the impression of coalition success.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.

Show comments
  • balance_and_reason

    Ssmack down…..socialist eyes down…double the number of new places than under labour, and in a recession.

  • you_kid

    ‘dodging’ – I like that. It sounds like the opposition was indeed thoroughly defeated once more!

    • balance_and_reason

      They were…they will be..

  • JoeDM

    I watched it and it was indeed a masterclass in how to win a debate by being totally on top of your material.

    Gove was able to answer all the opposition’s questions with facts and logic without any padding or bullsh!t. Poor Tristram Hunt sat glummly opposite and looked utterly shell-shocked.

    Despite how much I dislike Cameron’s modernised Tories, Gove is clearly the pick of the bunch when it comes down to effectiveness.

    • you_kid

      You too are dyslexic? What is wrong with you chaps.

    • exSecondaryModernTeacher

      Gove never answered the question. He avoided it. His material was selective (obviously no mention of Al-Madinah, Discovery New School, Kings Science Academy, the two much-lauded free schools in Bedford and Greenwich which didn’t impress Ofsted, the critical EFA reports into E-Act and Barnfield who sponsor free schools, another critical EFA report into Brighton and Hove Bilingual School…), misleading (comparing a tiny sample of inspected free schools with thousands of other schools) and repetitive (how many times can you blame Labour for NOT spending money?).

      His backing group added to the waffle. Ex-schools minister Nick Gibb was in a different debate – he asked about “progressive” education unaware that the successful independent schools he praised (eg Eton) embrace the type of teaching Gibb would class as “progressive”. Sir Edward Leigh said free schools were “hugely popular” with Tories – opinion polls don’t back him up.

  • CharlietheChump

    Gove is without doubt the most capable Minister in this government, and, indeed he would have starred in all the Tory administrations since the war.

    • Inverted Meniscus

      Agreed but watch out for comments from the Nation’s idiot Telemachus claiming that Gove is some kind of social Darwinist. As if that socialist nutter knows what he is talking about.