X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Five things you need to know about the Myners Co-op report

7 May 2014

6:15 PM

7 May 2014

6:15 PM

The Myners Report into the Co-operative Group (pdf) has been published today, and it doesn’t make for pleasant reading. Following the discovery of a £1.5 billion black hole in their finances, followed by the Paul Flowers ‘crystal Methodist’ scandal, the Co-op commissioned the former City Minister Paul Myners to look into the group’s problems and put together a restructuring plan to make it sustainable and properly governed. Here are the key things you need to know from the 180-page report:

1. The Co-op group is still ‘manifestly dysfunctional’

Lord Myners is not impressed with the current state of the Co-op Group and warns it needs to radically change ‘soon’ or face breaking up. The report suggests there are still ‘deplorable governance failures’ and that the board is ‘still stuck in denial over this near ruinous failure of governance’. The scale of the change required to reshape the group is significant and throughout the report, Myners hints he isn’t confident the group will accept the speed and scale of reshaping necessary.

2. A smaller board should be adopted

The report states that the current board of the Co-op group is ‘not competent’ to perform the duties expected of it and there is ‘limited shared purpose among group board directors’. Myners blamed the board directly for the group’s troubles:

‘It is one of the great national business calamities and it is being led by a board totally unable – because of a lack of experience – to hold them to account’.

[Alt-Text]


To replace the current bottom-up structure — the Co-op has 48 area committees with ~10 members, who in turn elect seven regional boards with 15+ members — Myners proposes a board with six or seven independent directors, two executives as well as a separate National Membership Council, to body to handle the concerns of members.

3. There should be a greater focus on being profitable

The group presently appears to have polarising priorities. As one anonymous shareholder told Myners:

‘Some want a dividend, some want low prices, some want to do social good and some want free range chickens.’

Obviously, the Co-op is a cooperative, which is not necessarily designed to maximise profit. But the report argues that the future safety of organisation’s financial health ‘can only be restored through steady, step by step, rebuilding of the Group’s profitability and repayment of its excessive debt’.

4. There is no easy route to fixing the group

With 90,000 employees and 600 elected members, the group has a lot of stakeholders shouting their concerns, including many with distinct ideas about how the group should change. In his summary, Lord Myners warns:

‘There is no short cut to recovery from its present weakened state. It will require retrenchment and some painful choices. After 150 years of development, and an extended period of financial decline, the organisation has seen more than half of its net assets wiped out in the past five years’

5. Shareholders will decide whether to back the reforms on 17 May

Approximately 100 members will meet to discuss and vote on a restructuring plan in just over a week. This would be the first major step towards reforming the group.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close