X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Culture House Daily

Civilisation doesn’t need a woman presenter – and it doesn’t need to be remade!

1 May 2014

3:40 PM

1 May 2014

3:40 PM

I was pleased to see that June Sarpong had added her weight to Kathy Lette’s petition to get a woman to present the BBC’s remake of Civilisation. I’ve often wondered what became of her after Five Go Dating, a show I used to watch religiously, and one which – if you’re listening, Channel 4 – equally deserves to be resurrected.

Lette’s letter is in yesterday’s Times. She complains that Kenneth Clark’s original had little to say about women (true) and that because of this, a ‘female historian’ should take the reins this time. ‘A female presenter’, argues the Australian novelist, ‘would ensure that the series is not just about History but also Herstory. It’s imperative that women also have a voice in the story of our world.’

As well as Sarpong, the motley crew of signatories includes Shami Chakrabarti, Caitlin Moran, Bianca Jagger, Sandi Toksvig, and ex-Peak Practice star, Haydn Gwynne. There are no men among the 50-odd names. Either no man agreed to sign a letter that included the word ‘herstory’, or none was asked.

[Alt-Text]


The potential presenters Lette throws into the mix are: Mary Beard, Sue Perkins (only joking), Lisa Jardine, Amanda Vickery, Marina Warner, Bettany Hughes, Frances Stonor Saunders, AS Byatt and Hermione Lee. It’s not a bad list, most of them are intellectual heavyweights. I’m unconvinced AS Byatt is a natural TV presenter, but then neither was Kenneth Clark.

What I find offensive is the idea that only a woman can ensure that women would be fairly represented. It’s sexist and patronising, to women and to men. It also shows a fundamental ignorance of the original series, which focused on western art, architecture and philosophy – not the whole of history. And which was famously subtitled ‘A Personal View’.

More problematically, it’s all very well saying women’s contribution to history and the arts should be reflected, but how’s that going to work in practice, given that women were prevented from contributing much to civilisation? Will the episode on the Enlightenment be dedicated to Mary Wollstonecraft? Insist on an anachronistic equality agenda and you risk overstating the significance of particular women – aka the Mary Seacole effect.

And why stop at women? I’m still waiting for Owen Jones’ petition for a working-class presenter who can ensure working-class people’s contribution to civilisation is accurately recorded. Let’s not forget all the poor craftsmen who died during the building of Chartres Cathedral. And while we’re at it, how about a Muslim presenter, as only they would be capable of giving Arab civilisation its due?

I loved Kenneth Clark’s Civilisation (watch it on YouTube NOW). Which is why I think Tony Hall’s idea to remake it is a stupid, broadsheet-pleasing idea that smacks of a nostalgic, Govian approach to broadcasting. If it has to go ahead, my vote is for Grayson Perry. But why not save a few million quid and just repeat the original?

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close