X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

A new poll shows Scotland on the brink of independence. Time for the ‘no’ side to panic

20 April 2014

11:05 AM

20 April 2014

11:05 AM

Politicians always manage to take some crumbs of comfort from opinion polls but, if you are Alistair Darling, it would be difficult to find anything positive in the dramatic new poll published by Scotland on Sunday this morning.

According to the poll, by ICM, the No camp’s lead has shrunk to either three or four percentage points – depending on whether the ‘don’t knows’ are counted. Ladbrokes has responded by cutting its odds on Scottish independence to 9/4, the shortest in its history.

The overall ICM/SoS figures are No 42 per cent (down four points on last month), Yes 39 per cent (unchanged on last month) and ‘don’t knows’ 19 per cent, up four on last month.

If the ‘don’t knows’ are discounted, the figures are Yes 48 per cent and No 52 per cent.

hmsir

Either way, it is now hard to deny that the ‘No’ camp has lost the seemingly impregnable lead it held at the end of last year.

[Alt-Text]


Mr Darling and his allies in Better Together have to wake up to the fact that they have managed to blow a 20-point lead in a few months and the gap between the two sides looks like it is now within the margin of error for polling companies.

Not only does the Yes camp have the momentum, it has the foot soldiers on the ground in numbers the No camp can only dream about.

Every independence-supporting activist is out knocking on doors, delivering leaflets, staffing high street stalls and persuading wavering voters to come along to public meetings and they are doing this in all weathers.

Because it is hard – indeed almost impossible – to motivate activists to go out and campaign for the status quo, the No camp has nothing like this sort of ground campaign.

Here is just one little example of the gulf between the campaigns at a local level.

A senior unionist politician is due to hold a public meeting in rural Scotland later this week and a few hardy No supporters have had to send out urgent messages to friends and colleagues to get them to turn up.

That is because they are worried that, unless they can get some No supporters along, the meeting will be overrun by Yes supporters who will do their best to intimidate and overwhelm that unionist politician and turn what should be a pro-No meeting into a disaster.

It was always assumed that the No camp represented the silent majority in Scotland.

This may well be the case but the trouble with a silent majority is that they don’t get out and campaign.

At the moment they still seem to have a majority but the vocal minority of Yes supporters are closing the gap by persuading more and more of the undecided to back their cause.

There either comes a point when the silent majority stops being silent and starts to speak out and campaign, or it will stop being a majority at all.

PS From Fraser Nelson. All this before Gordon Brown’s planned intervention – he is expected to weigh in next week, lending his own good luck charm. Remember, the history of most referenda show the ‘no’ side gaining ground in the campaign. Only one broke this trend: Quebec’s referendum. That one ended up 49.8% ‘no’. The future of Britain could be decided on a margin just as tight.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close