X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Coffee House

Nigel Farage faces down ‘Establishment’ plot

15 April 2014

12:49 PM

15 April 2014

12:49 PM

This morning’s edition of The Times reported (£) that Nigel Farage could face a probe into claims, apparently lodged by a former UKIP official, that nearly £60,000 of ‘missing’ European Union funds have been paid into his personal bank account. Mr Farage denies the allegations in strong terms and has invited EU officials to examine his expenses.

This is not the first time that UKIP has faced allegations about fiddled expenses. Yet none of the mud has stuck. There are two reasons for this: nothing has been proved and few people appear to understand how the European parliamentary expenses system works (there is, for example, a less than clear distinction between expenses and allowances). One could hear a fine example of the latter on the Today programme this morning, when Nigel Farage corrected Justin Webb’s line of questioning:

‘We do not claim expenses for running offices or any other activity that takes place within our member state the United Kingdom. We get an allowance, a fixed rate allowance and we can spend it how we see fit. It is £3,580 a month and that is given to MEPs and we can spend it how we want to – we don’t have to prove receipts for it or anything like that…I said from the beginning that I would use the money… from the European Union to fight against Britain’s membership of the European Union and to do so with the rule of the Parliament.’

[Alt-Text]


Webb protested; but Farage simply sailed on while railing against the iniquitous ‘Establishment’ (whatever that might be) and its newspaper of choice, The Times.

(Incidentally, Guido reports that the UKIP official who apparently made the allegation is now saying that he was misquoted by The Times, which has led UKIP to alter its line of defence to: ‘sloppy’ journalism.)

Farage’s argument that UKIP is working towards the abolition of EU expenses through the withdrawal of Britain’s membership of the EU depends on the probity and commitment of his members – and a lot of UKIP MEPs seem to tire of the strenuous work required. As Sean Kippin and Richard Berry revealed here earlier, 8 UKIP MEPs have jumped ship since 2004, which accounts for 62% of the total number of British MEPs to defect over the period. This fact does not scream of seriousness and purpose, and voters might well ask whether their vote and money is well spent on UKIP.

The greatest danger to UKIP is not ‘the Establishment’; it’s the disproportionate number of jokers in the pack.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close