X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Coffee House

David Cameron is linking Ed Miliband to Labour’s past mistakes

30 April 2014

2:41 PM

30 April 2014

2:41 PM

What a very long PMQs today, presided over by a very bumptious John Bercow. The Speaker let the exchanges run into what he called ‘injury time’, made a rather poisonous jibe at Labour MP Fiona Mactaggart over her private schooling, and told the Prime Minister that as far as he was concerned, he had finished an answer when the PM didn’t believe he had.

[Alt-Text]


As will increasingly be the case as we approach the general election, the two parties turned up wanting to talk about two different things. David Cameron wanted to talk about this week’s handy GDP figures, but Ed Miliband had decided to use this week’s select committee hearings on the Royal Mail as a way of not talking about growth at all. He was helped by Brian Binley’s ‘Alice in Wonderland’ comments at the committee. So the Labour leader complained about the ‘rip off of the taxpayer’ of the privatisation, and David Cameron tried to link this to Labour’s past economic mistakes, complaining that he was having to take lectures from the party who had lost money selling the country’s gold. He then widened this Back to the Future attack to other ghosts of Labour past returning, such as the sons of former Cabinet ministers seeking election in 2015. Cameron wants to suggest to the public that Labour hasn’t changed a jot from the party it deserted in 2010. Ed Miliband wants to suggest that Cameron isn’t really listening to the public and is just keen on his cronies in the city.

But though the polling on Royal Mail backs up Miliband’s attack (the public didn’t like the idea of privatisation), his problem is not that Cameron does have plenty of good news to shout at him, but that the polling also suggests that the public remain suspicious of the ghosts of Labour’s past on the economy. He may find other government cock-ups over the next few months to talk about, but it will be difficult to avoid talking about the improving economy entirely.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close