X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Blogs Coffee House

As the Yes side rises in the polls, Scotland prepares for a Neverendum

23 April 2014

1:37 PM

23 April 2014

1:37 PM

I suspect I might be one of the Scottish journalists Iain Martin considers keen to make a melodrama from the independence referendum. Ten weeks ago I warned in this magazine that Alex Salmond could well lead Scotland to independence. Stuff and nonsense some folk said then. Well, perhaps. But nothing that has happened since has persuaded me I was wrong. 

Sure, the polls still show the No side leading but the general picture is clear: the Yes side are closing the gap. Of course there’s no law demanding that current trends continue indefinitely but, nevertheless, these are nervous times for the Unionist cause.

And for good reason. Consider the poster at the top of this post. It’s by far the best advertisement released by either side. Clear, simple, powerful.

Also, of course, mildly misleading since sensible Unionists do not dispute the notion Scotland could – after an awkward period of adjustment – make a pretty decent fist of life after independence. Can’t isn’t the real question. Should Scotland be independent is a different matter. Equally, does Scotland need to be independent? Self-evidently not since, by Salmond’s own estimation, it is a happy, successful, attractive place already. Could be better, perhaps, and might even be so after independence but scarcely intolerable now.

[Alt-Text]


Too often, however, Unionist politicians and the Better Together campaign have given the impression that independence is, ipso facto, a daft notion only nincompoops and dreamers could possibly favour. Perhaps. The country suffers no shortage of nincompoops and is amply stocked with dreamers too.

Some negativity is to be expected. It is the No campaign after all. Nevertheless you can have too much of a good thing and the Unionist campaign has become imprisoned by its own negativity. It risks becoming dreary. I say this not because I’d like it to be more exciting because that’s the sort of thing political journalists like but because there is a real risk that voters will simply cease listening to new warnings of disaster around the corner. There they go again…

Perhaps I spend too much time talking to and reading nationalist voters and this distorts my view of the referendum. Be that as it may, it is not difficult to find Yes voters. There are a lot of them out there and they’re not going anywhere.

There is a school of thought arguing that Better Together should have saved their biggest artillery for the final few weeks of the campaign. Offer a positive, uplifting, vision of the the Union’s future and then, in the final stages, nuke the Nats with negativity. See all these good things we enjoy already and by the way you might want to consider some of the costs and drawbacks that are an inevitable price of independence. They have, generally speaking, chosen the opposite approach.

It isn’t working brilliantly.

Sure, the balance of probabilities still favour a No vote but the days when Unionists dreamed of a 70-30 victory have long gone and will not return. 60-40 is the limit of their hopes these days and privately many concede they won’t reach that mark either. 55-45 will now be reckoned a decent result but it’s not an outcome that will settle the matter. Not even for a generation.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close