X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

#ToryBingo could still benefit the Conservatives

22 March 2014

4:45 PM

22 March 2014

4:45 PM

Isabel and Sebastian are right: #ToryBingo is embarrassing. The advert was crass to the point of being idiotic. The use of the word ‘they’ rather than ‘you’ to describe ‘hardworking people’ was sloppy. The episode has taken some of the gloss off an otherwise shiny Budget. It is, emphatically, bad PR.

That said; I don’t imagine that the Tories will be too displeased by the furore. #ToryBingo has given a huge amount of exposure to two Budget measures that would otherwise have been buried beneath the pension announcement: the Tories have cut tax on bingo and duty on beer. Neither of those measures is going to turn the next election in the Tories’ favour; but, beside the increases in the personal allowance and the effort to control council tax over the last 4 years, it creates an impression that the Tories are on the side of working people on middle-to-low income.

Speaking as as a basic-rate taxpayer in no danger of the fiscal drag (though not I regret as a Bingo player), I have to say that the pension announcement means little to me because my pension is so vanishingly small – enough to buy a toy Lamborghini, perhaps, but not much else. A very long working life stretches out before me and, to be honest, the prospect isn’t much fun. A pint of beer with friends every now and then is one of the things that I enjoy.

[Alt-Text]


Do I feel patronised by the beer duty cut? Hell yes. But I feel patronised by more or less everything politicians say: from the ‘hardworking people’ mantra of the ‘out of touch’ Tories, to the Labour Party’s maddening presumption that it represents my best interests by virtue of nothing other than its illustrious history. A plague on both your houses, I say.

But, of course, petulance can never be a policy for someone in my financial position; I need to find a way of bettering myself. Unless and until wages outstrip inflation (and I’m sceptical that, in my job and with my skills, they will), my best hope is that my taxes are cut.

This is why politics matters to me – and this is why I’m quite happy to be patronised by #ToryBingo: the Tories are keeping my taxes down. I have a little more disposable income now than I did in 2010 – not much, but a little. Sure, the government could do more, much more – especially to VAT, property taxes and energy bills. But what, on the other hand, is the Labour Party proposing to do to my tax bill?

This week’s Budget gave me a very clear indication. The public finances are still a mess. The Labour Party can countenance neither spending cuts nor significant money saving reforms to public services – Ed Miliband couldn’t even respond to the Budget that was delivered. What am I, a low-to-middle income earner, supposed to make of this performance? There’s only one conclusion: Labour will raise taxes. They’ll raise everyone’s taxes and make lots of noise about ‘bankers’; but, when I think about it, I really don’t care about bankers and their bonuses: the only thing that matters is my tax bill.

If the Tories can transmit this relatively simple message to the millions of voters who are in my financial position, then Ed Miliband will lose. And, on the evidence of this week, he deserves to lose.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close