X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

Sir Malcolm Rifkind delivers a stern warning on Ukraine

18 March 2014

2:55 PM

18 March 2014

2:55 PM

MPs moved seamlessly today from debating the breeding season of the hare to the situation in Crimea. It’s been quiet recently, but this afternoon the House of Commons chamber hosted one of its better speeches from Sir Malcolm Rifkind, who was bristling with a cold, disapproving fury. This crisis, he told MPs, wasn’t just a crisis for Ukraine, it was a crisis for every European country. And Europe was failing to recognise this, and failing to respond adequately, he argued.

‘For the first time since 1945, a European state has invaded the territory of another European state and has annexed part of its territory. The Foreign Secretary, the Prime Minister, President Obama, other European leaders have stressed, as has the Shadow Foreign Secretary, that this is a crucial moment in the history of Europe.

‘That’s fine rhetoric, but the rhetoric is only going to be justified if it is matched by our response to what is happening and what could still happen. And I have to say that on the basis of the measures announced so far by both the United States and the European Union, on visa controls and asset freezes for individuals, I say with great sadness that is a pathetic and feeble response that does not match the seriousness with which those implementing these responses have themselves acknowledged we face at the present time.’

He warned that Crimea showed that the Russian objective was to ‘effectively control all the areas of the former Soviet state’ and warned that European leaders needed to do everything they could to be able to look themselves in the eye ‘in order to ensure that that the horrors of the 1930s are not repeated – not in exactly the same form, but in a form that will damage European security and stability for a generation to come’. He argued that Putin needed to feel real financial pain on the Russian economy in order to stop.

[Alt-Text]


Hague in his statement had made clear that the UK will be pushing for further sanctions with European leaders. He also announced that Britain is suspending all arms exports to Russia and stopping military co-operation with the country. He wasn’t bristling in quite the same way as Rifkind, but his language was strong. He warned that ‘the credibility of the international order will be at stake’ if leaders did not send up to ‘such a profound breach of international agreement’. He also warned chillingly that ‘there is a grave risk that we have not seen the worst of this crisis’.

P.S. It was clear that Labour wanted to be supportive, with Douglas Alexander rebuking one of his own MPs – Paul Flynn – for speaking out of turn. The House should speak with one voice on this, he argued. Which sounds very noble, but Alexander’s constant desire for restraint does frustrate some in Labour who are keen to hear some kind of discernible policy from their party.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close