Culture House Daily

New play forgets that rape is not just an Indian problem

9 March 2014

12:26 PM

9 March 2014

12:26 PM

A play about the 2012 Delhi rape was never going to be easy viewing and unsurprisingly Yael Farber’s Nirbhaya is painful to watch. It’s easy to close a newspaper when details are too graphic or flick a TV channel when the news becomes unbearable. But this performance is painful because it confronts the most difficult of truths in the most gritty detail. And we, as the audience in the stifling intimacy of the Southbank’s Purcell Room, were unable to look away.

Conceived by Indian actress Poorna Jagannathan and scripted by South African playwright Yael Farber, Nirbhaya is currently being performed in London as part of the Women of the Word festival at the Southbank Centre. The play tells the story of the gang rape of student Jyoti Singh Pandey in December 2012 which provoked national and global outrage.

The play sets itself a tough task. How can rape be portrayed on stage without converting it into entertainment? Farber confronts this difficulty by moulding the theatrical medium to allow the most careful and intensely personal depiction of its subject matter possible, primarily by using a cast who (apart from two members) have all suffered from sexual abuse. They tell their own stories, blurring the line between reality and performance.


Although the play gets off to a slightly weak start, the thread is soon filled with the personal accounts of the cast. This is when Nirbhaya begins to most effectively articulate its subject.

All of these personal accounts are raw and fraught, as if each actor is about to break mid-performance. Sneha Jawale’s account is the most difficult to watch. Doused in kerosene and set alight by her husband before being separated from her young son, her story is visible on her skin. It’s audible in her voice, as she speaks through tears. It is evident that this is not drama; it’s a process of translation,  literally and figuratively. Her Hindi is translated into English as she moves her experience from her own body into language.

Nirbhaya touches on the global problem of sexual violence by exploring a rape that takes place in Chicago. But it is still easy to walk away from the play under the illusion that sexual violence is a problem unique to India. Worldwide, one in three women will experience rape or violence in her lifetime. Even as we condemn the events in India, it cannot be forgotten that here, in the UK, with our much smaller population, over 400,000 women are sexually assaulted each year.

We have a culture where women are objectified and controlled and become targets of sexual abuse. Although the events in India have provided an essential arena for the discussion of sexual violence, Nirbhaya leaves the global situation shrouded in silence. Farber insists that the Indian protests act as a type of ‘inspiration’. Perhaps more attention could have been drawn to the work of so many Indians in the aftermath of the rape.

Nirbhaya is not quite theatre. While the cast have adapted their stories for performance, they are not assuming roles. They are not acting. Therein lies the strength of this play; its ability to combine performance and activism, stark reality and the symbolic purpose of theatre. Nirbhaya is an important play – one that is impossible for audiences to leave behind.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.

Show comments
  • Treebrain

    “New play forgets that rape is not just an Indian problem”

    Oh, Radhika, but it is, it so much is, because so many revered and respected figures in Indian society continue to refuse it is even a problem let alone attempt to address the issue.

    • Gigi

      If a play is about a rape that takes place in the UK is it about rape in the UK? Not necessarily. Its unfortunate the author is do defensive. The play as I experienced it is about breaking the silence. Women are taught not to speak of these things. To be ashamed. Not to cause trouble for the perpetrators. This play challenges that norm. The horrific violence suffered by Jyoti, the apathy of those around her while she suffered, these are global issues. The collective response of the Indian public is something to be proud of. It is a galvanizing step forward for women in India and throughout the world. I saw the play yesterday and am in awe of the courage and conviction of those on stage (and of course Yael Farber). Hopefully it will inspire others to break the silence whether they are in India or Indiana.

      • Bemused

        Gigi, I agree with you but I think you are saying something very similar to the author. It’s dangerous to overlook the fact that sexual violence is absolutely everywhere and it is easy to feel distant from the problem if we see it only in the context of India. I thought the play was beautiful but the one thing that I wished, after watching a play so powerful, was that it spoke more for womenkind as a whole. If the main purpose of the play was to break silence about rape rather than ‘rape in India’ specifically, this could have been done by making people viewing aware of how it’s a problem faced daily, hourly, by women inside and outside of India. No, this author is not defensive at all. I think there is difficulty voicing even the smallest critique against plays/films/books dealing with tricky subjects like this, but I think it is important that critics do this as it can help us to depict this crucial subject in an even more powerful way.

  • Daniel Maris

    India is addressing the problem, which is excellent. Next door neighbour Pakistan legalises rape, especially of non-Muslims.

    • Treebrain

      Er, except that actually India is NOT addressing the issue of rape at all!

      India refuses to accept reality, just as it will not accept that HALF the worlds population who live in abject poverty are resident in India.

      What shame the country brings upon itself!