X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

Esther McVey shows that the Tories are aggressively on message

31 March 2014

5:23 PM

31 March 2014

5:23 PM

Work and Pensions Questions in the Commons has long been a battle between the two main parties for the moral high ground, but today Esther McVey, who appeared even more energetic than usual, made that battle just a little bloodier. She scolded Sheila Gilmore for not smiling when she talked about more people in employment and then listed ‘all the good news that is happening’. Then she told Stephen Hepburn that he hadn’t read the figures on the labour market, joking that ‘the honourable gentleman spoke with gusto but that was all he spoke with’. She was quite keen on the word ‘gusto’, actually, praising Nigel Adams for asking a question ‘with such gusto’. And then Labour MP William Bain told her about a young man in his constituency who was desperate for work after being out of work for 18 months, and asked McVey what she had to say to this constituent. McVey went in for the kill. She bellowed:

‘Well I would like to have a word with the young chap that you’re talking about because what I’d like to give him is hope and optimism, something you’re distinctly not giving by running down – I apologise! [as MPs shouted ‘oooh!’], Mr Speaker, not your good self, but the honourable member from the opposition because what that young chap needs is hope, he needs optimism, he needs to know what is happening in the rest of the country because other people are getting jobs, youth unemployment has gone down, long-term youth unemployment has gone down and if he sticks with it, and gives it a go, he will get there in the end and that is the best news I can give him because it’s far better under this government than it was under the Labour government where youth unemployment went up by 45 per cent!’

[audioboo url=”https://audioboo.fm/boos/2034280-mcvey-young-people-need-hope-and-optimism”]McVey vs Bain[/audioboo]

[Alt-Text]


This clearly had nothing to do with rumours circulating the Westminster Village that McVey could soon fly into the Cabinet.

In spite of the rising animosity in the Shadow Cabinet about Labour’s strategy, the party’s backbenchers are still bang on message, asking ministers repeatedly to adopt Labour’s compulsory jobs guarantee. But Conservative ministers are now even more aggressively on message, referring as often as they can to ‘our long-term economic plan’ and attacking Labour for failing to move disabled people back into work. There was some fury from the Opposition benches when Iain Duncan Smith made that claim, but he ploughed on. He and McVey are clearly keen to fight as aggressively as Labour on welfare.

P.S. Today’s session was quite energetic, but lobby journalists in the press gallery were still a little surprised to see a couple holding hands and nuzzling one another happily in the public gallery above the Chamber. Who knew DWP questions was the latest hot date in London?

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close