X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Cameron continues silver offensive

24 March 2014

6:22 PM

24 March 2014

6:22 PM

David Cameron is doing his best to do what the Tories haven’t always been that impressive at: capitalising on the clever political bits in this year’s Budget. He was at a PM direct event in Peacehaven today, driving home the importance of the government’s reforms to pensions to his target voters.

But he also had the opportunity to woo them with other policy treats, such as what the Tories might promise on inheritance tax in their next manifesto. ‘Would I like to go further in future?’ he said. ‘Yes, I would. I believe in people being able to pass money down through the generations and pass things on to their children.’ He added that ‘it’s something we’ll have to address in our manifesto’.

That he’s prepared to drop this big a hint is a sign that the Tories feel the economic mood has changed: people will only worry about inheritance tax if they think they’re going to have enough left to pass on to their family. And he’s clearly less worried about headlines suggesting the Tories are just helping their rich friends.

[Alt-Text]


Where he was a little less clear was on pensioner perks, repeatedly telling the gathering that the Conservatives had kept their promise to protect those benefits in this parliament but that ‘I don’t want to pre-judge’ the decisions in the next manifesto. He did argue though that ‘you save a tiny amount of money’ by means-testing those benefits.

Cameron knows that keeping promises is important: one of the reasons he has been so stubborn on pensioner benefits in the face of increasing campaigning from George Osborne and Iain Duncan Smith on the matter is that he saw what happened to the Lib Dems when they let down their target voters on tuition fees. And pensioners are more likely to vote than students. But he also knows that the Lib Dems want to do something with many of these benefits after 2015, and that his own colleagues think it’s untenable to make another ‘read-my-lips’ pledge.

You can read his full quotes below:

On inheritance tax:

‘Would I like to go further in future? Yes I would. I believe in people being able to pass money down through the generations and pass things on to their children. I think you build a stronger society like that and I think of course we should, you know, we have to have caps and limits and you have to think about those but generally speaking we should be encouraging people to pass things on to their children. And one of the reasons why George Osborne made that pledge was this point about property, was that when the limit was £300,000 or so, quite a lot of, you know, hardworking families who had worked hard, who’d saved, who’d put that money into the house were being caught by inheritance tax. And inheritance tax should only really be paid by the rich, it shouldn’t be paid for by people who worked hard, who saved and who bought a family house, in say Peacehaven. So the ambition is still there, I would like to go further, it’s better than it was but it didn’t make it into the coalition agreement but it’s something we’ll have to address in our manifesto.’

On pensioner benefits:

‘I made a very clear pledge at a Saga gathering and I made it again at the election that we should keep the pensioner benefits, obviously all pledges are about the parliament that you’re going into and we make new pledges in our manifesto for the next parliament. But we said very clearly we would up-rate the basic state pension, we’d keep the winter fuel allowance, the free TV licence, the bus pass, the cold weather payments. We’ve done all of those things, we’ve kept our promises in all of those areas, we’ll set out or policy for the next parliament at the next election. I don’t want to pre-judge that. The only thing I would say is that people who think you save lots of money by not giving those benefits to upper rate, top-rate taxpayers, you save a tiny amount of money and you always introduce another complexity into the system. So, you know, but we made our promise in this parliament, we’ve kept our promise in this parliament we’ve kept our promise in this parliament, and I’m very proud of that because I don’t think older people in Britain should be asked to suffer for the difficult decisions that we have to make and making promises and keeping promises is a very important part of politics, and you know woe betide the politician that makes one of these promises and says oh well sorry I didn’t mean it.’

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close