X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Blogs

A selfie isn’t a form of protest, it’s a form of narcissism

20 March 2014

3:20 PM

20 March 2014

3:20 PM

How to protest these days? You can’t rely on our music industry to kick out a good protest song, and the film industry does a pretty feeble job. So once again, it’s down to the people. In the past few years, we’ve seen a couple of examples of how Generation Y protest: Case Study 1: The 2011 riots. Case Study 2: The 2010 tuition fees protest. Quite old school in style, and not hugely effective, but both at least showed there was still some fire in the belly of Britain’s yoof.

There’s a new case study to add to the Generation Y protest list. 3: The Selfie Protest, or SelfRighty, as I call it. It’s bloody simple, and perhaps therein lies its supposed ‘brilliance’. You can protest, without even getting out of bed. Very John Lennon. All it requires is a smartphone, yourself, and some vague political message.

In the past year, we’ve seen various examples of the SelfRighty in action. Feminist factions commandeered it for the ‘Who Needs Feminism’ campaign, in which lots of people explained why they really needed the movement. In reality, what most of them actually needed was a good haircut and some whoopee. But I digress.

An 'I Need Feminism' selfie

An ‘I Need Feminism’ selfie

[Alt-Text]


We then saw it in action for the #StandbyMe protest, in which students in Sheffield protested government policy on immigration. Friends of different nationalities took selfies together, to show just how forward thinking they were by befriending people who didn’t look exactly like them.

Friends sans Frontières (Photo: The University of Sheffield

Friends sans Frontières (Photo: The University of Sheffield)

The SelfRighty then moved to Oxford for the ‘I, too, am Oxford’ movement.  Wanting to raise awareness about racial prejudice at the university, a number of students took selfies of themselves carrying handwritten signs with messages saying things like ‘No, I’m not on a scholarship from Africa’. This act of ‘bravery’ was met by a countermovement of students keen to disprove the idea that racial prejudice existed at the university. Damn straight.

A countermovement by 'We Are All Oxford' (Photo: http://wearealloxford.tumblr.com/)

A countermovement by ‘We Are All Oxford’ (Photo: http://wearealloxford.tumblr.com/)

And then this week, the SelfRighty was deployed again. In fact, it’s still being deployed. Type in #nomakeupselfie into Twitter, and you will find girls posting pictures of themselves not wearing makeup. Presumably this is an act of bravery because they are normally caked in the stuff. They are trying to raise awareness of cancer, which is something to be applauded. What’s not to be applauded though is how this form of protest is essentially a vanity movement.

A brave #nomakeupselfie (Photo: Tegustaaa)

A brave #nomakeupselfie (Photo: Tegustaaa)

Using a selfie to protest something is not brave. Maybe the first person to do it was brave, but it has quickly become hackneyed, and smacks of narcissism. It is about I, not We. The pretense is ‘we’re all in this together’, but that’s obvious drivel. Posting a photo of your makeup-free pout, or you, set against the glorious Oxford cityscape, with a soft-effect filter on, may make you feel better about yourself, but does it really help your cause? It raises awareness, sure – but awareness of yourself. That’s it. It’s frustrating that people seem to think it’s doing anything else.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close