X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Coffee House

A ‘no’ to Scottish independence won’t save the Union

10 March 2014

2:40 PM

10 March 2014

2:40 PM

The longer the Scottish referendum campaign goes on, the more I fear for the long-term future of the Union. I suspect that the pro-Union campaign will win this September, but the way in which they will do this is storing up problems for the future.

The pro-Union campaign has, so far, concentrated on two messages: the dangers of independence and the fact that there’ll be more devolution if the Scots vote no to independence. These tactics will help with this September’s referendum—indeed Hamish Macdonell argues persuasively that a ‘devo plus’ offer would deliver victory. But strategically they are storing up problems for the future.

Gordon Brown is today proposing a whole slew of extra powers for the Scottish parliament. If the Brown blueprint was implemented, it would exacerbate the problems posed by the West Lothian Question. At the moment, the West Lothian Question doesn’t really bother the rest of the United Kingdom. But if pushed too far, they’ll be a backlash at the asymmetrical nature of these arrangements.

[Alt-Text]


There’s more merit to Ming Campbell’s suggestion of Home Rule for all the constituent parts of the UK. But given that England makes up just over 80 percent of the UK’s population it is hard to see how that would not lead to a power struggles between the English Parliament and Westminster and the English First Minister and the British Prime Minister.

The lesson of devolution is that we tamper with the constitutional framework of the United Kingdom at our peril. But all the major political parties seem intent on continued tactical constitutional tinkering. It is hard to see how this doesn’t end in disaster. ​

PS From Fraser Nelson Brown’s involvement is perhaps the worse news the ‘no’ campaign has had this year. It suggests a squabble with Alistair Darling, who’s running Better Together (Brown is speaking under the auspices of the separate United With Labour).  Unlike Darling, Brown will unnerve the ‘tartan Tories’, the former Conservatives who switched to the SNP. Ever the partisan, Brown’s speech today is trying to slip a Labour agenda into the slipstream of the ‘no’ campaign.

Brown suffers from a messiah complex, seeing himself as some kind of saviour. But as the 2006-10 period demonstrated, he repels voters in Scotland as much as he did in England. At one stage, Brown was living in a LibDem constituency because his intervention in the Dunfermline by-election was decisive against Labour, and in a country governed by the SNP after he worked his reverse midas touch on the 2008 Holyrood campaign. Labour held out in Scotland, but that was in spite of Brown.

Brown is a decent tactician, but a dreadful frontman. He’s just the chap the SNP need if they want to pitch the referendum as a decision between the future, or the past. Short of a reincarnated Edward Longshanks, I can’t think of anyone Alex Salmond would rather be up against.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close