X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Blogs

Women shouldn’t see fertility treatment as a lifestyle choice

17 January 2014

4:50 PM

17 January 2014

4:50 PM

Pasted between adverts for chewing gum and the latest Hollywood blockbuster, a series of adverts on the tube are currently flogging ‘fertility for the over-40s’. They come at a time when Professor Dame Sally Davies, Chief Medical Officer for England, has recently commented on Britain’s attitude to fertility.

Davies said she was concerned about the ‘steady shift’ towards women choosing to postpone starting a family until their late 30s and early 40s, reducing their chance of conception, and increasing their medical risks. ‘We all assume we can have children later but actually we may not be able to,’ she said.

Why do women continue to assume they can have children at whatever age they like? Almost all the evidence suggests that it’s far healthier to have a child in your younger years. Looked at from a biological view, we are animals, designed to reproduce. There is a certain time frame in which to do this (the dreaded ‘ticking clock’) and after that, your time’s up.

[Alt-Text]


For women, peak fertility is in their early 20s, and drops considerably after the age of 35. Fertility treatment has lengthened the time period in which a woman can have a child, and successful treatment has been documented in women as old as 67. But the point Davies makes is this: a longer window of opportunity is not necessarily a good thing.

Fertility treatment has many laudable aspects. But women are increasingly seeing it as a way of ‘having it all’. The assumption is that you can delay having a baby (often for the sake of a career) and that treatment will then come to the rescue once you decide you are ready.

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has previously published advice suggesting that if women want to start a family, they should consider doing so between the ages of 20 and 35. It is advice that continues to be ignored, given that the average age of a mother giving birth in the UK is now 30 – the highest in the world alongside Germany.

Patrick O’Brien, a spokesman for the institution, has confirmed that the average age of motherhood has been rising steadily for years. Following Davies’s comments, he said:

‘In my experience it is usually because women want to get an education, maybe travel and get established in their careers before they think about starting a family and often don’t appreciate the difficulties that can mean.

‘Quite often we will see businesswomen of 42 or 43 who will think that with IVF they can easily have a baby, whereas really success rates are very low for women using their own eggs.’

O’Brian added that women in their late 30s and early 40s have far higher rates of miscarriage and foetal abnormalities. They are also much more susceptible to health problems that can affect childbirth.

Like it or not, women must stop seeing fertility treatment as a lifestyle choice. It is wonderful that such treatment exists, but to see it as a ‘quick fix’ is wrong. Selling people fertility on the tube suggests we have taken a step in the wrong direction.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close