X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

What will 2015’s broken promises be?

9 January 2014

4:59 PM

9 January 2014

4:59 PM

Ed Balls’ softer language about Nick Clegg might be an inevitable repositioning of the Labour party in the run-up to another hung parliament in 2015, or it might be the shadow chancellor trying to get ahead of the game after the end to his 2013 was rather bruising. But it is worth mulling the sorts of things that, aside from personalities, the two parties could struggle with.

One is the language that those at the top have used about Labour wrecking the recovery. At the 2013 Lib Dem autumn conference, Nick Clegg said:

‘Labour would wreck the recovery. The Conservatives would give us the wrong kind of recovery.’

Some Labour figures such as Lord Adonis felt this was unfair on Labour: wrecking the recovery is far worse than swerving off balance, surely? But this sort of language is easily forgiven when government looms: just remember the awkward jokes in the Rose Garden in 2010 about comments David Cameron had made about Nick Clegg.

[Alt-Text]


However, what might be more interesting is how Labour squares its own use in opposition of Lib Dem broken promises with the likelihood of pledges that it is making now actually making it into government policy. Ed Miliband set the autumn weather with his energy price freeze pledge, and spent the months after his conference speech standing next to large ice cubes that symbolised the promise. Cleverly, though, they didn’t have a specific commitment written on them, which, as we all know, is the only wise thing to do after the last time someone signed a bit of paper with a promise on it:

Nick Clegg Addresses The Liberal Democrat's Scottish Spring Conference

Whenever Harriet Harman faces Nick Clegg in the Chamber, she takes great pleasure in reminding him of his broken promises. Today at Business Questions, Angela Eagle used Boris Johnson’s condom joke to rib Clegg about his broken promises, saying:

‘I would like to disagree with the Mayor of London, who this week called the Deputy Prime Minister a “prophylactic protection device”. Now I know I am not the world’s greatest expert in this area, but I thought you were supposed to be able to trust contraception.’

But if Labour finds itself in Coalition with the Lib Dems, then it will face the task of trying to freeze energy prices when the Lib Dems have been as clear as crystal that they think this a dreadful policy that would damage investment in the energy sector. Though party sources aren’t keen to say they’d definitely block it, muttering about the danger of setting out red lines, presumably if they, like the Tories, are sincerely worried about the impact that forcing companies to freeze their prices would have, they would block it in government. And if that happened, Ed Miliband would find his ice cubes looking a little less sharp.

This is all hypothetical, of course, but one of the features of the next 17 months of general election campaigning will be these questions about what policies each party would make a red line. Would the price freeze be one for Labour?

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close