X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

What does Jessica Lee’s exit say about the Tory party?

21 January 2014

11:05 AM

21 January 2014

11:05 AM

Why has Jessica Lee become the fourth female MP from the 2010 intake to quit? The Erewash MP announced yesterday that she is standing down in 2015, saying ‘I have carefully considered by personal circumstances and responsibilities at this time, before taking this decision’. Friends of the popular Conservative say she is keen to return to her former job as a barrister, which is fair enough: in all walks of life people find that a career change doesn’t suit them as much as they thought. But is there a deeper problem here?

Some are arguing that this is illustrative of a woman problem in the party, and indeed the Conservative benches are not exactly stuffed with female MPs. But is it also that the life of an MP isn’t quite what some people expect, or are led to expect?

[Alt-Text]


When backbenchers arrive in the Commons at the start of a Parliament, they share committee rooms until the offices are allocated. This means many friendship groups form between those camped in certain rooms, but it also marks the start of a chaotic time for MPs. They are not given advice on how to run a parliamentary office, and, having been promised an exciting career as a ‘turbocharged’ backbencher, and prospects for promotion and influence, find themselves trying to work out how to do their first job as a constituency MP with little more than the help of friendly veteran MPs to guide them. That is the case for MPs from all parties, but there is a mood amongst the new intake that being an MP hasn’t turned out to be all it was cracked up to be when they decided to be a candidate all those years ago. ‘I think a lot of new MPs haven’t enjoyed the role as much as they had hoped,’ one new intake MP remarked to me.

Perhaps more of those MPs would have enjoyed the role more if they felt properly used as backbenchers. There is still a sense that at the heart of the party there is a sizeable knot of MPs who are not confirmed Cameron haters, but neither are they the aggressively loyal Claire Perrys of the Conservative party. They are biddable, but still often left to their own devices. Attempts to keep them busy haven’t worked out as well as hoped: the Number 10 policy board, for instance, seemed like a good idea, but it is becoming clear that this isn’t the influential group it was sold as, and more of a conduit between backbenches and Prime Minister, which is useful in itself but still a mis-labelling. Perhaps the recent outbursts from Nadhim Zahawi and Jesse Norman’s departure were a result of frustration at this discovery.

But then there’s also the gruelling work of fighting in a marginal seat. Marginal Tories don’t go to as many parliamentary party meetings or receptions as their colleagues with cushy majorities because they’re often far busier in their constituencies trying to shore up support. Lee’s majority is only 2,501, and if she wasn’t much enjoying her job anyway, another exhausting fight in 2015 may have just looked like it wasn’t worth it.

Now, as I said, people realising a career change was a mistake isn’t unusual in any walk of life. But it does present a challenge to the Conservatives, who do want to attract and retain talented candidates with a wealth of experience in the world outside Westminster.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close