X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

Alex Salmond is impaling himself on problems of his own making

13 January 2014

3:39 PM

13 January 2014

3:39 PM

When the independence debate finally started to rumble last year, most people thought it would be the big issues which would dominate as we approached polling day – defence, foreign affairs, welfare, the future of the monarchy and so on.

But here we are, just eight months out from the 18 September referendum and there are two very different issues dominating the agenda – childcare and student tuition fees. On both of them, moreover, Alex Salmond has managed to get himself impaled on problems of his own making.

First, childcare: when he launched the White Paper on Independence back in November, the First Minister promised a ‘revolution’ in childcare if Scotland became independent. He pledged that Scottish two-year-olds would get 600 hours of childcare in the first year of independence, increasing to 1,140 hours for all youngsters from one to school age by the end of the second parliament.

But it did not take long for his opponents to realise that Salmond has complete control over childcare for Scotland at the moment. He could introduce those very changes now, under devolution, rather than holding them out as a carrot for Scots to vote Yes in September. Salmond’s argument then got somewhat convoluted. He said the changes would cost hundreds of millions of pounds to introduce and it was not worth the Scottish Government spending that money now when the benefits of the changes – in terms of a more productive economy and a greater tax take – would be enjoyed by the Westminster Government.

Salmond then went further and yesterday published the Scottish Government’s own analysis of the policy, claiming it would boost the Scottish economy by £2.2 billion if such ‘Swedish-style’ childcare was introduced. Again, he reiterated his argument that the Scottish Government had to enjoy the benefits of the change and would not be able to do so under devolution.

[Alt-Text]


So here we have an SNP First Minister claiming that childcare is the key issue for the independence vote yet advocating a policy which does not need independence to be implemented. But it is not just the SNP’s political opponents who have questioned the SNP’s approach to childcare. A series of experts spoke out over the weekend to warn that the Scottish Government’s figures were flawed.

They said that many of those who would benefit from free childcare were already paying for it privately now and were already in jobs. Therefore, any investment by the state in taxpayer-funded childcare for them would be wasted and not produce any extra tax revenues for the state nor economic boost for the country. They also warned that the childcare plans were still based around providing cover for school hours, which did nothing to help women go back to work on a full-time basis.

All of these criticisms, from experts and political opponents, have made the First Minister look hesitant, unsure of his ground and lacking in vision – not quite the impression he wants to make this close to polling day.

However, the First Minister has also got himself into a mess over tuition fees.

As is well-known, Scottish students don’t have to pay fees at Scottish institutions and neither do students from the rest of the EU. Students from the rest of the UK are the exception and they have to pay fees at Scottish universities. The Nationalists are very aware that, after independence, when the UK becomes a foreign country with the same status to Scotland as, say, France, there could be a flood of UK students into Scotland seeking free tuition fees. As a result, Salmond has insisted that the current – apparently discriminatory – system would continue after independence.

A group of unionist academics calling themselves Academics Together went public at the weekend attacking the policy and demanding that Salmond publish any legal advice he has supporting his policy. The First Minister, unsurprisingly, refused to do so, hiding behind his usual argument that governments never reveal the existence of, or the content, of legal advice.

The result is that the First Minister is being gently roasted over two policies which he thought would be vote winners – free university education for Scots and much more childcare for toddlers. Both policies were designed to show that Salmond’s administration was compassionate, family-friendly and forward looking.

But all they have done is show that there are very real problems with the little issues involved in independence, More than that, though, they have left many Scots with the uncomfortable feeling that, if the little things about independence are this difficult and complicated – how bad are they going to be when we get to the really big ones.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close