X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

The ravelling and unravelling of the only policy in David Cameron’s speech

3 October 2013

5:37 PM

3 October 2013

5:37 PM

David Cameron’s speech to Tory conference yesterday was supposed to be policy-free so that the media would pick up his list of achievements because it had no other choice. The problem with this, though, was that the papers found a policy in the speech anyway, and if they did splash on the speech, they chose this policy, not the ‘finish the job’ line or any other (although the Mail used the ‘Land of Hope is Tory’ line). It was on housing benefits for the under-25s, but it wasn’t exactly ready to be a set-piece conference announcement, more a fleeting reference to gain more applause in the hall.

qPqIXjShqr1hRCPh yqnrob4h 0Gc22O1h 5tB1QHQh YSNmjYe

[Alt-Text]


Because the policy wasn’t quite ready, a rushed briefing came out when it was demanded. You can read the note in full at the bottom of this post. The reason I’ve included it is that it shows how little detail there is on it. But it isn’t, as many thought yesterday, a full ban on benefits for the under-25s. I explained the differences in this post, and James had details of the discussions around this policy in his Mail on Sunday column months ago. To underline that this is not the full ban on benefits but a sanctions policy, Nick Clegg today told LBC that he could support it too, while he opposes an outright ban. He said:

‘I’m all for making sure there’s better conditionality so that the incentive to just rely on benefits is minimised; I’m not in favour of just blanket removal of people just because they happen to be a certain age.’

But because there wasn’t much detail to bandy about, the story has been written up in a multitude of ways. And this means that it’s quite easy for people like Frances O’Grady to claim that the policy is already unravelling, as she has here. But the truth is that the policy hadn’t even been ravelled yet: it hasn’t got to the stage where it could unravel. So perhaps the lesson from this week’s Conservative conference is that if you want to give a policy-free speech, don’t give one containing references to things you haven’t quite worked out yet.

Briefing note issued yesterday on under-25s benefits plan:

Today’s announcement builds on the PM’s speech at last year’s conference when he raised the prospect of stopping housing benefit for under 25s. In his 2012 conference speech, David Cameron said: ‘we’re going to look at ending automatic access to housing benefit for people under 25 too’.

An existing review being led by Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood is looking at training and education for under-25s and will feed into this policy. The Heywood review is also looking at reforms to support young people while they are in training.

Under existing rules, young jobless people lose their benefits if they train for more than 16 hours a week. As a result, the system pays them if they are not in training – but stops supporting them when they do and the Heywood review is looking at ways to support young people after they’ve commenced training programmes.

Those who refuse to take part in the scheme will lose automatic entitlement to some benefits including job seekers’ allowance and housing benefit. This policy is a bringing together of Iain Duncan Smith and Michael Gove’s ground-breaking welfare and education policies with making work pay and getting the education and skills necessary to prosper in life. A fully fleshed out version will be in the Conservative party manifesto – and further details will be set out in due course.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close