X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Coffee House

The clever councils keeping localism in vogue

4 October 2013

11:20 AM

4 October 2013

11:20 AM

One of the problems with localism is that it sounds very grand and clever in opposition, and then turns out to be a nightmare to implement in reality. A minister recently remarked to me rather grumpily recently that ‘all the good people left local government because Labour starved them of responsibility’, and a lack of skills at the top does make it a little more risky to hand powers from Westminster to councils. But there are local authorities who are savvy and brimming with ideas who do want – and deserve – more control over policymaking, such as Manchester. Manchester has caught the eye of Chancellor George Osborne for being an experimental authority, and I look at its worker bee ethic in my Telegraph column today.

But councils like Manchester aren’t just keen to run pilots for the government because they are somehow affable: they know that the more competent and clever they show themselves to be, the more power they are likely to get. Manchester is part of the Core Cities group of councils – Birmingham, Bristol, Leeds, Liverpool, Newcastle, Nottingham and Sheffield being the others – which is currently campaigning for greater financial freedom along with Boris Johnson. They want devolution of property tax revenues streams and the power for councils to reform those taxes too.

[Alt-Text]


There is also pressure within the Conservative party from campaign group Renewal to give cities more power. Renewal is interested in devolution to cities from an electoral point of view: they think this will broaden the appeal of the Conservatives by supporting job creation in urban areas where most voters don’t consider voting Tory to be an option.

Labour is also, I understand, mulling its own new version of localism. Party strategists think that this government’s planning policies have been sufficiently botched for a Labour 2015 manifesto to offer local people a ‘real say’ over planning, for example. They too are trying to get a piece of the Manchester magic, consulting council leader Sir Richard Leese as one of the three co-chairs of the party’s local government innovation task force. I also hear that the party is considering coming up with a new name for localism that appeals to voters.

But whatever the name is, localism is clearly still in vogue, and that is partly down to this ambitious generation of councils who, like Manchester, are prepared to make the case for Westminster politicians trusting them more and more.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close