X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Treasury questions: George Osborne takes aim at Labour’s record in opposition

10 September 2013

2:22 PM

10 September 2013

2:22 PM

Listen to Osborne and Balls’ exchange at Treasury questions here:-

‘I hope this is not our last encounter across this despatch box,’ George Osborne said rather slyly to Ed Balls this morning at Treasury questions. ‘Because we are enjoying it.’ The Tories were in a good mood, because they’ve decided that they can now start to talk about the economic clouds lifting, and this means that they can say that everything Labour has ever said is wrong, wrong, wrong. ‘Cheer up Ed!’ Sajid Javid shouted cheerily at the shadow Chancellor as another Tory MP used their question to say that George Osborne has been absolutely correct in every decision he’s ever made.

[Alt-Text]


But Osborne and Balls were also enjoying staking out their usual territory. When it came to topical questions, Ed Balls leapt to his feet, and reeled off his regular Angry Ed Balls recital that appears at every Treasury Questions. He bellowed:

‘On growth, on living standards, on the deficit, on every test the Chancellor has set himself, his economic plan has failed, Mr Speaker. Since 2010, growth not 6.9% but 1.8%, families not better off but worse off and the deficit not down to £60 billion but stuck at £120 billion. How on earth can the Chancellor now claim his economic plan has worked? After three wasted and and damaging years, doesn’t he realise he can’t just airbrush out his failure?’

George Osborne’s reply made him sound rather like a teacher asking pupils to own up to who had pinched all the red felt tip pens. The Chancellor was half in a good mood about his decision that the economy is on the up, and half in a strange scolding schoolteacher mood.

‘The Shadow Chancellor can’t airbrush out his predictions. He said the double-dip recession was even deeper than he thought, there wasn’t a double-dip recession. He said it was a complete fantasy that private sector job creation would replace losses in the public sector, they have three times over. And three months ago he said our policy would choke off the recovery. The fact is this: he cannot stand the fact that the economy is recovering, his plan would have been a dictate and let us fear that the predictions about his own future in the shadow cabinet turn out to be more accurate than his predictions about the British economy.’

He later chuckled that ‘we are enjoying the fact that he simply does not admit the mistakes that he made not only in office but in opposition and i have to say he is increasingly like Monty Python’s Black Knight defending that bridge… the limbs are falling off his economic argument and it would be a comedy if it weren’t for the fact that Labour’s economic policies were a tragedy for this country.’

And he repeatedly glanced at the clock and pointed out the length of time this session had worn on for without an apology from the Labour frontbench for their own economic record. But he took as much pleasure today in talking about Balls’ economic record as shadow chancellor (or ‘Deputy Chancellor’ as Sir Peter Tapsell accidentally called him during his customary long question about Glass-Steagall reforms) as he did in criticising what Labour did in government. Osborne clearly wants to tell voters that the evidence for not trusting Labour on the economy comes as much from what they’re saying now as it does from what they did when in government.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close