X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

Yet again, Labour’s self-serving efforts to block The King’s School merger have failed

26 July 2013

6:16 PM

26 July 2013

6:16 PM

Labour’s war against The King’s School merger continues to be fought fruitlessly, despite rebuttal after rebuttal from the Department of Education. As first reported in the Spectator two weeks ago, Michael Gove has signed off funding for the independent King’s School and state Priory Primary School in Tynemouth to merge into the new Kings Priory Academy. North Tyneside Council are not happy with Gove’s decision and decided to call an ‘Extraordinary Council Meeting’ last week to decide what to do next.

Like many of the school wars in Britain, Labour’s response has been a bureaucratic one. If they can keep the indecision rolling until September, the new academy would be delayed and possibly never open. The council therefore wrote to the DoE, urging them to reconsider their decision.

Following the council’s letter, Lord Nash has written to the Woodard Academies Trust — proposed owner of the new Kings Priory Academy — to inform them the funding is safe and as far as he is concerned, the plans will go ahead. Coffee House has a copy of the letter sent today:

Screen Shot 2013-07-26 at 18.12.08

[Alt-Text]


As reported in the Newcastle Chronicle, the council are chiefly worried about protecting their school empire. They predict if King’s moves into the state sector, parents may no longer want to send their children to council-prescribed secondaries in the area, instead choosing the best possible school. New and better schooling places are not something North Tyneside Council appears to favour.

If there is any doubt whether the fight is politically motivated, one simply has to examine who is leading the charge. Councillor Ian Grayson, responsible for education in North Tyneside, is also a local NUT official, the teaching union who are coincidentally striking later this year in opposition to Gove’s reforms. The BBC are now on Grayson’s case, examining this potential conflict of interest. This is what Radio Newcastle had to say on the matter this morning:


It appears Grayson has not been entirely transparent about his dual roles. One parent explained there have been at least two council meetings where Grayson has failed to declare any potential conflict of interest over the new academy. He declined to be interviewed by Radio Newcastle today, stating he has already adequately explained why his union role has no impact on his councillor role.

It’s staggering that someone so ideologically opposed to academies is still publicly arguing the plans should be scrapped. Hopefully, Grayson and North Tyneside Council will now accept the merger is the best thing for the borough’s children. Their only remaining option is to instigate a full judicial review — which would be costly, a waste of time and most importantly, detrimental to education provisions in North Tyneside. With parents, the local community and both schools backing the Kings Priory Academy, Labour appears to be still fighting the merger purely for its own benefit.

UPDATE: Here is the full letter Lord Nash has sent to North Tyneside Council, outlining why the Department of Education has not changed their mind on supporting the merger:

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close