X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Exclusive: partisan EU referendum campaign dampens Labour support

25 June 2013

5:57 PM

25 June 2013

5:57 PM

The Tories are putting off Labour MPs from backing their Private Member’s Bill on an EU referendum with an overly partisan campaign, Coffee House has learned. John Cryer, who chairs Labour for a Referendum, tells me that he won’t be voting for the Bill because the Conservatives have turned it into a party political campaign to shore up their own position, rather than one that genuinely promotes a referendum. He says:

‘I’m not voting for it, I’m abstaining. I think the way the Tories have approached it is very party political. I can understand it in a way because they want to be in a position where they are offering people a choice, they want to try to push other parties on that policy.’

He also says that James Wharton, whose Private Member’s Bill it is, did not approach him about the legislation at all, which is odd given Cryer’s position on the group campaigning for Labour to promise a referendum. Cryer says:

‘He might have shown that they were a bit more genuine if they had approached some of us about this.’

[Alt-Text]


I understand from discussions with those who have long wanted a referendum that they are worried the partisan nature and political focus will distract from the broader cause. One campaigner says: ‘It’s supposed to be country before party on this issue, not the other way round.’

Wharton says he has had talks with Labour MPs about the Bill, and that he hopes many of them will support it. But he also says it was a decision on his part not to approach them for more formal support: the co-sponsors are all Conservative, save the DUP’s Nigel Dodds.

Clearly the LetBritainDecide campaign is an excellent opportunity for the party to remind voters that only the Tories currently offer them a say on Britain’s membership of the EU. It has united the party for a while and, as Sebastian explains, is useful for future party campaigns. But this is all about politics rather than the principle of a referendum, and it is this that annoys Cryer and campaigners. If other like-minded Labour MPs join him in abstaining, then only a handful from his party could end up voting for it. Perhaps that does not matter if the Tories are happy to see the bill die, as they can then blame Labour for failing to back giving people a choice on the EU. But if they are really keen for it to pass, then they will need all the Labour votes they can get, rather than putting MPs off.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close