X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

The Tories failed to make the case for relaxing childcare ratios: no wonder the policy bombed

9 May 2013

3:29 PM

9 May 2013

3:29 PM

Two ministers appeared in the Commons today to explain two different reforms. One is at the very start of its legislative life, appearing in yesterday’s Queen’s Speech, while the other one appears to be doddering about on its last legs after months of fanfare.

Liz Truss found herself summoned to the despatch box to explain her plans to relax childcare ratios in order to drive costs down after it emerged Nick Clegg wanted to block them. This isn’t a great surprise: the reform has excited strong opposition from the sector and parents. But what is strange is that the government never really made a great deal of effort to be aggressive about the idea in the first place. Relaxing ratios may have its merit, but the immediate reaction of any parent would be that the plan could put their precious child at risk from a distracted childminder. It is one of those proposals that might make perfect sense in Whitehall but which needs a great deal of groundwork before it can be sold to voters. There was perhaps an assumption that mothers have the same keen deregulatory instinct as a Tory MP who likes writing pamphlets.

There wasn’t this groundwork, which made it easy for opponents to brand it as a ‘pile ’em high’ ‘babyfarming‘ scheme. I understand that the plan had initially been for the launch of the policy to take place on an online parenting forum, which those organising it were warned would turn into a flame-grilling of the minister. It is just as well that this was abandoned as the policy would have bombed straight away. Similarly, there has been little attempt to explain the virtue – and safety – of the relaxed ratios themselves beyond their effect on costs. This has been a source of frustration for some Tory MPs, who know how important a good childcare offer is to their party’s chances in 2015, particularly with a falling female vote.

[Alt-Text]


Childcare reform was one of the key elements of the Mid-Term Review that didn’t do quite such a good job of showing how well the Coalition is working as everyone had hoped. That it appears dead in the water says a lot about the way the two parties are really working together, as really the Lib Dems appear to be able to pull the plug on something without too much effort.

Perhaps another ratios-style disaster for the Tories will be averted by the new Number 10 policy board. They are supposed to look at future policies and advise the Prime Minister on potential flashpoints. Childcare ratios would have been one such flashpoint.

Next up in the Commons was Chris Grayling, who gave his statement about his plans for rehabilitation of offenders. He has been making the case for his ‘rehabilitation revolution’ for months with countless speeches, interviews and op-eds, and today was just the next step in that. Grayling put in an impressive performance on this morning’s Today programme, pointing out that it was possible to offer more support without spending more money. He was helped in this by those he was supposed to be debating, who acknowledged that increased funding didn’t necessarily mean better outcomes for ex-offenders. His new policy was met with nit-picking rather than condemnation from Labour.

The difference between the receptions these two ideas have enjoyed underlines the importance of a communications operation that looks many months ahead at policies coming down the line and prepares the media, the opposition, and voters for it by making the arguments loud and clear. Whether it’s a more aggressive Number 10 comms strategy, or a policy board that speaks a bit of sense unto wonks, there needs to be more protection and planning for complex policies so they’re not left to fend for themselves.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close