X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Ministers aren’t just preparing for Coalition divorce, they’re organising arguments with their partners too

17 May 2013

9:04 AM

17 May 2013

9:04 AM

Reports today that the Conservatives are wargaming end-of-Coalition scenarios in the event of the Lib Dems leaving early won’t come as a surprise, given the bickering over the past few weeks on snooping, childcare and Europe. But in the interim, ministers are also trying to work out how both parties can practise a sensible differentiation policy without appearing to squabble endlessly for another two years.

Nick Clegg spoke about the need for sausage machine government before Christmas, with a call for honesty about the difference between the two parties on policies as they were being developed. He has annoyed Theresa May something rotten by sticking to that principle on the Snooper’s Charter (and the Times reveals some angry letters that flew between the two on this). But that was a good example of gory government. A bad example is the row over childcare, where both sides are arguing as much about who said what as they are about the policy itself.

Some Conservatives were initially reluctant when Clegg started talking about honesty and openness in government. But they recognise the need for differentiation. Many wish Number 10 had seen the Queen’s Speech as a key opportunity to start that in earnest by publishing the draft EU referendum bill alongside the government’s legislative programme, to make a real point about what a majority Tory administration could be doing. But at least the Bill is now out, has an MP looking after it, and has the opportunity to provoke some debate with the Lib Dems and tensions in the Labour party.

[Alt-Text]


The plan on the Conservative side is to be organised about the differentiation. Any ‘what we’d do without the Lib Dems’ moments will have big neon signs around them, rather than leaking out to journalists as behind-the-scenes rows. ‘We have got to do this in an organised way,’ says one Cabinet minister. The great risk is that voters simply see more arguments, rather than orchestrated pitches for their attention from the different parties. The leaders will need to sign off on each sausage machine moment, rather than being surprised by briefings to the newspapers.

One policy area that Conservatives want to see more differentiation on, and where Nick Clegg is more than happy to give as good as he gets, is human rights. I understand Chris Grayling is working on a plan for the Tory party to differentiate itself clearly and with concrete ideas on human rights. This will be unveiled in due course.

Differentiation doesn’t just rely on the careful planning of members of the Cabinet, though. The big lesson from this week’s mayhem on Europe is that a whole party needs to develop strong message discipline. The Tories are getting better at this, with Lynton Crosby pushing them harder, and a more proactive operation from the whips for events such as PMQs. But if Tory backbenchers are bickering, then it becomes a lot more difficult to organise a political row with the Lib Dems.

What is probably needed is a little bit more love. If the differences between the two parties get too personal, then the only thing that gets attention is the personal animosity, not the policy distinctions. It’s a delicate balance, and a real challenge for those at the top of the Coalition to get it right.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close