X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Nurses cannot dismiss calls for reform out of hand

22 April 2013

8:59 AM

22 April 2013

8:59 AM

It’s not unusual for a trade union representing its members to resist change, and today the Royal College of Nursing is sticking well and truly to form. Not only has Peter Carter, its chief executive, called the government’s plan to put nurses through a year of work as healthcare assistants ‘stupid’, he has also penned an op-ed for the Guardian in which he appears resistant to the suggestion that the profession needs to consider wholesale reform following the Francis Report. Carter writes:

‘For the million or so people working in the NHS, a number of things come with the job: a boom-and-bust budget, growing demand and a high level of public expectation. What staff don’t always expect, although many have now become attuned to it, is repeated criticism from the government responsible for the health service.’

Carter goes on to call Jeremy Hunt’s remarks about the ‘normalisation of cruelty’ ‘unintentionally misdirected’, adding that ‘the sad reality is his remarks disappointed many in the health world, myself included. Yes, poor care happens and the Royal College of Nursing will never be a refuge for it; however, it is not systemic and if the rhetoric is overblown, people will take comments like these less seriously’.

[Alt-Text]


It must of course be disappointing to hear a hard-working and altruistic profession which you have served for many years being painted in the light that Jeremy Hunt chose to do following the shocking Francis Report. But the RCN must beware appearing resistant to any suggestion that the training and continued development of nurses needs examining to ensure patients’ best interests are the priority. Does the profession believe, for instance, that good nurses should be rewarded for their hard work with a promotion that gives them a clipboard and more time away from the bedside? Can the RCN explain what the boundaries between healthcare assistants’ work and nursing should be? Carter says in his pieces that HCAs must be regulated and trained, as recommended by Francis. He also wants legally enforceable staffing levels on wards. These are all sensible ideas, but there is no suggestion in his response that nursing itself has any questions to answer.

Unsurprisingly, Ann Clwyd, the Labour MP leading a review of the way the health service handles complaints, took a dim view of this argument that no systemic failures exist in nursing. On the Today programme this morning, she told Carter:

‘Two thousand emails can’t be making up a story. Two thousand people have bothered to write to me and are still writing to me and they all mention the same things over and over again. Things like having panic buttons out of reach, not being able to reach their food and water. I had one story about a woman who had two broken wrists, they were up in the air and the food and the water were dumped at her side. That story is repeated over and over again.’

Those who defend the NHS from all criticism often use emotional case studies to shut down valid debate about the service it provides. But Clwyd’s case studies are just as compelling as the success stories. They – and the recommendations of the Francis report – cannot be ignored, and the RCN must beware appearing to dismiss any case for reform out of hand.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close