X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Mid-Staffs scandal: The Tories must beware focusing solely on Andy Burnham

14 March 2013

5:17 PM

14 March 2013

5:17 PM

MPs were debating accountability in the NHS following the Mid-Staffs scandal today, and as part of that, the argument about who – if anyone – should be held responsible continues to rumble on. Charlotte Leslie and many of her Tory colleagues want to see Sir David Nicholson gone (and The Telegraph‘s Robert Winnett reports that senior government figures are considering a route by which he can exit). But the focus of Jeremy Hunt and other Conservatives is on Andy Burnham instead. Today Hunt said:

‘[Nicholson] does bear some responsibility. He said himself ‘we lost our focus’, he has apologised and has been held to account by this House and others. But I don’t believe that he bears total responsibility, or indeed personal responsibility for what happened.’

Hunt said Nicholson had ‘consistently warned’ of the dangers of hitting targets without improving care, and added that ‘others do bear a far more direct responsibility’, including the board of the Trust. But he also rejected the argument advanced by Andy Burnham that ‘there were cases where the underlying culture of the NHS didn’t change’ in spite of ‘well-meaning’ policy changes. Hunt said that ‘Labour did make three huge policy mistakes and he must accept that it is not simply a question of government policy not being implemented’. Hunt also had a little moan about the way Labour likes to focus on the motives of the current government in reforming the NHS rather than the detail.

[Alt-Text]


The shift from ‘there should be no scapegoats’ to ‘Labour has questions to answer’ happened last week. The Prime Minister’s PPS, Sam Gyimah, included a question about Labour and the Mid Staffs scandal on the list of suggestions for PMQs that he sent to Tory MPs. In the end, it fell to a Labour MP to raise Nicholson, which allowed David Cameron to say ‘other people, frankly, should be thinking of their positions too’.

Burnham was understandably anxious about what the Francis Report might say about him, although in the end the final publication made more comfortable reading than he’d anticipated. He took care today to say that Labour ‘will face up to what went wrong… and I repeat that apology for the families of those who suffered appalling abuse and neglect’. He also criticised ‘a tendency to pull the shutters down’ in the NHS when complaints appeared. But his argument that good policies weren’t being implemented was not particularly convincing.

Actually, if Labour were the party in government now and Mid-Staffs had happened on the Tories’ watch, it’s hard to imagine today’s debate being quite so polite. But Hunt dismissed ongoing concerns about Nicholson and aimed again at Burnham. Nicholson may need to stick around to implement the complex web of NHS reforms in the next few weeks, but the Tories must beware of attacking just one group that was involved, rather than all groups. Labour does have questions to answer. But it’s not the only name in this row. Jeremy Hunt wants to paint himself as a ‘patients’ champion’, and to that end he needs to look at those other managers involved in Mid-Staffs. He made some moves on this today, attacking the board members at the Trust who ‘seem to have melted into thin air’. There is a danger that the Conservative party turns this issue into a political game if it just focuses on Burnham and other Labour figures. So it does need a plan for Nicholson, even if it involves him implementing the reforms and then going in the summer.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close