X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Blogs

Is that a ‘no’ then, Owen?

13 March 2013

12:56 PM

13 March 2013

12:56 PM

To my simple suggestion that Owen Jones apologise for claiming that an 11-month old child killed by a Hamas rocket was in fact killed by an Israeli ‘so-called targeted strike’, Owen appears to have answered ‘no’.

He starts his reply: ‘In the last couple of years I’ve learned one thing: the right don’t like me very much, and expend a sizeable amount of energy attacking me personally rather than my writing.’

In saying that he has learned even ‘one thing’ I fear Owen exaggerates. He begins his next paragraph: ‘Hard right pseudo-intellectual [Douglas] Murray…’ Nothing worse than attacking a person rather than their writing is there? Of course it is no concern to me whether Owen thinks me an ‘intellectual’, pseudo or otherwise, or regards me as hard, soft or medium right. What matters are the facts. Incidentally Rod Liddle attacks Owen’s writing here.

Owen is now attempting to argue that this is about facts other than the one he picked up and ran with, or that it is not about what he has said but what other people have or have not said. He writes that ‘Murray and his cynical allies [who are these people?] are attempting to bury the contents of the rest of this [UN] report.’ Though I cannot of course speak for my mysterious ‘cynical allies’ I myself have no such ‘plan’. I am simply inviting Owen to admit he used a fact that was wrong. Here is why it matters.

[Alt-Text]


Currently Owen’s main justification for not correcting his factual error boils down to: ‘Everybody else was doing it!’

There are three things to say about this:

1). No they weren’t. Some who have observed the wars in that region know that although you have to be careful about attributing casualties in the heat of any conflict, you must be especially careful with this one.

2). Even if every paper in the world had attributed the blame incorrectly that would not mean that they should not now correct their mistake, or that Owen should avoid doing so.

3). So far as I know, none of the journalistic sources Owen cites (such as the Washington Post) used the tragic death of an 11-month old child as a springboard for a demagogic and self-righteous rant against Israel on prime-time TV. Owen did not simply report a fact, he used the ‘fact’ to rail against Israel in a speech packed with lies about that country which singularly failed even to mention the genocidal anti-Semites of Hamas. As the clip can remind people, Owen delivered his one-dimensional anti-Israel diatribe in a tone of absolute moral certainty on prime time television to a potential audience of millions.

If Owen does not wish to correct his mistake then that is his prerogative. But I think people might rightly wonder in future why he should be listened to on such matters. Journalism and propaganda are different things. Owen appears to have demonstrated that his devotion to the latter trumps his aspirations to the former.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close