X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

How to be an anti-politics party in government: make the public sector accountable

3 March 2013

1:58 PM

3 March 2013

1:58 PM

One of the lessons from last week’s Eastleigh by-election – and indeed the Italian elections – is that voters don’t like politicians at the moment. It’s easy for those like Nigel Farage to mop up this anti-politics sentiment in the same way as Nick Clegg could say before the 2010 election ‘the more they attack each other, the more they sound the same’. But how does the Conservative party try to appeal to those voters fed up with the Establishment of which it is so clearly a part? David Cameron can hardly start attacking himself, after all.

There is one thing that the Tories could do – and which their backbenchers are pushing for – which would at least undermine a sense that the party is tied up in the cosy Establishment. Unfortunately, it’s something the leadership is notably reluctant to do. The government could address accountability in the public sector, rather than letting those involved in poor quality services continue to rise through the ranks. That’s a long-winded way of saying that David Nicholson, NHS chief executive, should be held accountable for his involvement in the Mid-Staffs scandal.

[Alt-Text]


Conservative MP Charlotte Leslie wrote about the Early Day Motion that she’s tabled which calls for just that on Coffee House on Friday. She said:

‘I have tabled an Early Day Motion calling for the man who was in charge of the Strategic Health Authority overseeing Mid Staffs and who was later running the NHS when the 2008 damning reports were buried, to be held to account – and support for it is building amongst MPs. If responsibility in the NHS is to mean anything at all, David Nicholson must go.

‘But just as it is false to claim that the problem is a one-off in Mid-Staffs, when it is an NHS-wide issue, it would also be a mistake to assume that calls for accountability are just about one man. It is not. The EDM is about making a stand against an entire culture, and calling to account all those — former Ministers, officials, medics and highly paid managers, who were negligent in their duty to protect patient safety.’

Ministers, including David Cameron himself, have repeatedly said they don’t want to seek scapegoats in this scandal. Fair enough: as Leslie says, this isn’t about laying the sins of an entire system on one man. But for no-one at the top to be held accountable at all smacks of a cosy relationship between government and the public sector that serves no-one well at all.

Nicholson was not a harried nurse caught up in the system who dropped his standards of care because everyone else seemed to be doing it. That in itself is shocking. But he had oversight of the hospital itself, with all the generous remuneration and comfortable career prospects that these positions afford. The flipside is that if someone’s performance clearly does not merit such comfortable perks, then they must lose them.

Yes, do blame the system by all means. But systems are made up of and checked by people at the top. And when those people at the top don’t have sufficient insight into how badly wrong that system is going, then they are failing. They are not taking on the sins of others, like the scapegoats of the Old Testament, but falling on their own swords. And covering for those who should be taking responsibility makes politicians part of that cosy Establishment. Michael Gove hinted at the problems this causes on Friday when, referring to Mid-Staffs, he said ‘there’s a sense there that the establishment, however you describe it or however constituted, has let folk down’. If Cameron wants to suggest that the Tories aren’t wrapped up in the sort of politics that rightly upsets voters so much, then he should start with accountability in the NHS.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close