X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

Don’t panic: the Tories can do better than Eastleigh

1 March 2013

3:23 PM

1 March 2013

3:23 PM

There’s no disguising the fact that last night’s result was a very disappointing one for Conservatives.

There were three small crumbs of comfort.

First, the poor performance of Labour, our only realistic rivals in terms of winning the next Election. The opinion polls say Labour are doing 12 or 13 percentage points better than they did at the last Election, but on the ground in Eastleigh they increased their share of the vote by just 0.22 per cent. In the 1994 Eastleigh by-election, held before Tony Blair was elected Leader, Labour came second with 27.6% of the vote.  Yesterday, they managed fourth place with just 9.8% of the vote, suggesting – as do local government by-election results week in week out – that their opinion poll lead is soft and that they will struggle to win their target seats, particularly in the South.

Second, logistically the campaigning team at CCHQ ran a good operation.  The campaign centres were well run, the literature looked professional and every time I went to help my time was well used.

[Alt-Text]


Third, the Party was up for the fight. Lots of people went to Eastleigh to help, many of them on more than one occasion, making up for our lack of organisation in the seat.

But though we can draw some comfort from these three crumbs, the result demonstrates to anyone who didn’t know it already that we face three big challenges.

First, rebuilding our ground organisation in many target seats.

Second, the difficulty of gaining Liberal Democrat seats.  Eastleigh shows that we cannot rely on a national fall in the Liberal Democrat share of the vote to deliver lots of seats to us. In seats with a strong Liberal Democrat presence, people vote Liberal Democrat because of their local record, not their national record – Chris Huhne’s conviction, the accusations about Lord Rennard were never going to make much difference.  When I was out knocking on doors, I met elector after elector who said they were voting Liberal Democrat because ‘they do a good job round here’.  At the General Election, we will have an additional argument at our disposal – we will be able to say that unless people vote Conservative there is a real risk that they will end up with Ed Miliband as Prime Minister. But as people like Andrew Jones and Steve Brine demonstrated at the last Election, we have to match the Liberal Democrats at pavement politics in the years leading up to an election to get permission to make these national arguments. In Eastleigh, where every single councillor was Liberal Democrat, we hadn’t done that.

And finally, the UKIP threat. Now that the Liberal Democrats are in government, UKIP have taken over as the natural party of protest at by-elections attracting support from all quarters (according to a post-election poll by Lord Ashcroft, 22 per cent of 2010 Conservatives voted UKIP but so did 19 per cent of 2010 Liberal Democrats). But we shouldn’t just dismiss this as a protest. UKIP won’t do as well at the General Election – in Eastleigh or anyone else – as they did last night (Lord Ashcroft’s poll found that just 43 per cent of those who voted UKIP yesterday plan to do so again at the General Election), but there is a real risk that they will poll higher than at the last Election and if those votes come from people who would otherwise vote Conservative it will cost us seats. Of course, we need to reassure disaffected Conservatives on Europe and on immigration, but we cannot out-UKIP UKIP. Nor can we afford to focus exclusively on this group of voters – we also need to reach out to floating voters who may be more concerned about jobs, the cost of living or the NHS. As Tim Montgomerie has argued on Conservative Home this morning, we need a broad offering.

And most of all, we need to avoid panicking. It was a bad result. It has laid bare the strategic challenges we face. But plenty of governments have recovered from worse mid-term results and won. If we stick together and address those challenges, so can we.

Gavin Barwell is the Conservative MP for Croydon Central.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close