X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Can Ed Balls really crow about the downgrade?

23 February 2013

12:13 AM

23 February 2013

12:13 AM

As George Osborne digests the news of the Moody’s downgrade, he can thank his lucky stars for Ed Balls. The Shadow Chancellor’s statement, just released, neatly illustrates why he is the single biggest obstacle to Labour’s regaining economic credibility:-

“George Osborne said keeping the credit rating was the key goal of his economic policy. As his economic plan has floundered, it has been the last thing he has clung on to. And bizarrely his response tonight suggests he is not reflecting on why things have gone so badly wrong, but using this downgrade as one more reason to plough on with his failing plan – regardless of the damaging impact on struggling families and businesses.

Bizarre? Not nearly as bizarre as responding to the Moody’s downgrade by borrowing-and-spending even more – which is Balls’ proposed solution to this (and every other) problem. About £200bn more, according to IFS analysis of Labour plans. Balls is a classic debt addict, displaying his symptoms tonight:-

“In the Budget, the government must urgently take action to kick-start our flatlining economy and realise that we need growth to get the deficit down. If David Cameron and George Osborne fail to do so and put political pride above the national economic interest we face more long-term damage and pain for businesses and families.”

It doesn’t take a PhD in economics to see the flaw in Balls’ plan. Yes, growth has been abysmal. But the problem is that the government is already enacting on a massive debt-fuelled spending stimulus, and that it doesn’t work. Osborne will spend £92 billion more than he collects in tax over 2012/13. This stimulus, which amounts to a mammoth 6pc of GDP, is rather obviously producing very little results. Hence the downgrade.

[Alt-Text]


Would Balls really have us believe that things would be so much better if Osborne had borrowed-and-spent, say, £102 billion rather than £92 billion? And why would the extra £10 billion of spending “kick-start” the economy if £92 billion has not done so? The fiscal drugs don’t work. The growth hasn’t arrived – but we’re stuck with the debt.

If it were Alistair Darling fronting Labour’s attack, it may carry some force. Darling may say the debt should be used to cut taxes for the low-paid rather than the extra spending. That would be a more challenging critique, and one I’d have much sympathy with. But with Balls it’s just spend, spend, spend – which Osborne is doing. Just not (quite) as much as Balls wants.

Moody’s is calling time on this borrow-and-spend party – yet Balls is standing in the bar, vowing to drink himself sober. Seeing him on the TV tomorrow will remind voters that, no matter how bad things are with Osborne, they could be a hell of a lot worse.

 

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close