X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Labour’s mansion tax debate won’t be a crunch vote (or very interesting)

16 February 2013

10:59 AM

16 February 2013

10:59 AM

So Labour is going to force a vote in the House of Commons on the mansion tax. It’s the key announcement trailed as part of Ed Miliband’s visit to Eastleigh today, and yet it’s the sort of thing that only really excites people who look forward to hearings of the Public Accounts Committee rather than the average voter who has a more normal perspective on life.

The idea behind these Opposition Day debates is that Labour flushes out any rebels or unhappy Lib Dems, or that its MPs can later tweet ‘Lib Dems voted against their own policy in the Commons tonight #evil #nevertrustalibdemagain’. Miliband says that very thing today:

‘And what about the Lib Dems? There could be a majority in the House of Commons when it votes on our proposal. But only if the Liberal Democrats vote with Labour. Now the Lib Dems say they are in favour of a mansion tax. Well, they once said they were in favour of abolishing tuition fees too.’

[Alt-Text]


But the problem is firstly the one that I detailed above which is that these sorts of debates very rarely make stories and are often quite poorly attended by MPs on all sides. Secondly the motions that the Opposition tables for these debates are often interminably long and so over the top that it’s quite clear no Lib Dems would come wriggling out of the woodwork, even for their beloved mansion tax.

The Lib Dems are already rather amused by the idea. Stephen Williams, the party’s backbench Treasury spokesman in the Commons tells me:

‘Generally Labour MPs vote for Labour motions, and other people do not. They are doing just silly politics, this is the sort of thing that does not appeal to the public.

‘Tony Blair in 1994 and David Cameron in 2005 when he became Tory leader could credibly say I’m a new person, my party needs to change, I’m rebuilding it. But for Ed Miliband and Ed Balls, they were both in government when they abolished the rate, they simply have no credibility. We were talking about the mansion tax before the last election and Labour were trashing it back then.’

So this isn’t going to be what journalists like to call a ‘crunch vote’. The crucial day will of course be the Budget when the Coalition hopes to unveil yet another rise in the personal tax allowance, which as Ryan Bourne explained on Coffee House this week, is a far more effective method of helping low income households through the tax system than a 10p rate + mansion tax set up. The real crunch for the government is whether it’s able to make this case more effectively than Miliband by producing a Budget that doesn’t unravel so it can focus on this policy rather than on a series of U-turns.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close