X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Coffee House

Labour are the real losers in Eastleigh

26 February 2013

11:38 AM

26 February 2013

11:38 AM

The Lib Dems are still on course to hold Eastleigh. Despite the loss of Britain’s AAA credit rating and the unfurling Rennard scandal, Lord Ashcroft’s latest poll today puts their candidate Mike Thornton on 33 per cent. Tory candidate Maria Hutchings is lagging five points behind on 28 per cent while Ukip are a little further behind with 21 per cent. Disappointingly for Ed Miliband, the Labour party’s celebrity candidate John O’Farrell is coming in with just 12 per cent.

This confirms two things. Firstly, the by-election is only about local politics. As we discussed on last week’s View from 22 podcast, Chris Huhne has barely been mentioned on the doorstep. From the start, the Tories were worried the local Lib Dem machine would be impregnable — something that has turned out to be true. Despite being beaten with a flurry of politicians of all shapes and statures, Ashcroft’s polling states that 45 per cent of the Eastleigh voters are most concerned with electing the best local MP. Only 21 per cent consider the by-election a referendum on the coalition.

[Alt-Text]


On the economy, the loss of the AAA rating appears to have also made minimal impact. Or as Owen Jones argued in the Independent yesterday, it could a problem with Labour articulating its message. 57 per cent of those in Eastleigh state they trust Cameron and Osborne to manage the economy in the best interests of Britain, compared to 22 per cent for Miliband and Balls. A significant chunk of Lib Dem voters — 30 per cent — support the later pair, compared to just over half who plumped with Cameron and

The second is James’ prediction on the rise of Ukip is correct. Considering they polled just 3.6 per cent at 2010 election, their rise to 21 per cent is staggering. This is a by-election, so there is still a strong protest vote element. But if the party comes in third place it’s hard to deny that Ukip are still on the rise. There’s a chance Nigel Farage is kicking himself over his decision not to run himself — his persona could have driven them even higher. Judging by the soundbites and newspaper coverage, Farage appears to have been ubiquitous in Eastleigh anyway.

What this by-election has shown is the relative strength of the party machines. On the ground, the Lib Dems have run a determined campaign, while the Tories have been fighting desperately to come in second. According to Ashcroft’s data on voter contact, 37 per cent have had Lib Dems campaigners appear on their doorstep, compared to 30 per cent for the Tories (down 5 per cent from 2010). 18 per cent note phone contact with Tories compared to 28 percent for the Lib Dems.

Ukip have undoubtedly done well but how much is due to their on-the-ground operation vs. the party’s anti-politics credentials? However, as Boris Johnson argued in his column yesterday, Labour are the real losers in Eastleigh. It appears their vote has barely budged from 2010 and Ed Miliband’s southern mission hasn’t got off to a good start.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close