X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

The Tories mustn’t make another silly pledge on benefits in 2015

17 December 2012

2:19 PM

17 December 2012

2:19 PM

As the country approaches a general election, a party leader, desperate to reassure a key group of voters, makes a very silly pledge. He is as unequivocal as possible that, in spite of the big spending implications in a time of economic crisis, he will stick to this silly pledge to keep his target voters happy. Months later, a Coalition has formed, and those target voters are enraged because that promise turned out to be worth little more than the paper it was written on.

We all know that this is what happened with the Lib Dems and their extraordinarily stupid pledge to block rises in tuition fees. But in 2010, David Cameron also made a similarly silly promise, which was to protect universal benefits for older people, including the winter fuel payment, TV licences and free bus passes when he knew there would have to be a squeeze on welfare payments. He said in May 2010:

‘And let me say very clearly to pensioners if you have a Conservative Government your Winter Fuel Allowance, your bus pass, your Pension Credit, your free TV licence all these things are safe. You can read my lips, that is a promise from my heart.’

[Alt-Text]


Nick Clegg, who has been muttering about this for months, made another push on pensioner benefits today in his speech to CentreForum, mentioning ‘looking again at universal benefits paid to the wealthiest pensioners’. He might have half an eye on the work Ed Davey has been doing on the subject, first reported on Coffee House. The Prime Minister’s spokesman didn’t wait around to quash this suggestion, saying this morning:

‘The Prime Minister made a commitment to protect those benefits and he believes in keeping his promises.’

But aside from this wonderfully catty side-swipe, there are other Conservatives who are in favour of a move away from universal benefits,  including Robert Halfon and Nick Boles. Labour, meanwhile, continue to oppose any change in its own silly way (it was the party’s scaremongering on pensioner benefits that provoked Cameron into making his pledge in the first place): Liam Byrne told me last week that ‘Winter Fuel Payment is actually a very efficient benefit’.

Aside from the nonsense of cutting benefits for working-age people who need the support while continuing to pay pensioners a benefit regardless of their financial circumstances, the Winter Fuel Payment is not efficient because it does not deal with the source of the problem in many cases. Every year, a pensioner in a cold, poorly insulated house will spend their £200 from the government bringing their rooms up from freezing cold to just about bearable, while the heat continues to dance merrily out of the loft and the windows. Targeting the payment towards insulating those houses would mean it could in the future pay for homes to be warm.

Clegg is unlikely to get his way on this before 2015: the Lib Dems might have suffered for their silly promise on fees, but the Tories will need something enormous to persuade them to break the manifesto pledge on universal benefits. But even if Cameron lets the Lib Dem leader chunter away about his own policies to no real effect, he should at least take heed of those within his own party who don’t want it to be another silly pledge in 2015.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close