X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week. If you receive it, you’ll also find your subscriber number at the top of our weekly highlights email.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.spectator.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050. If you’ve only just subscribed, you may not yet have been issued with a subscriber number. In this case you can use the temporary web ID number, included in your email order confirmation.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

If you have any difficulties creating an account or logging in please take a look at our FAQs page.

Coffee House

Nick Clegg wants gory government: so should the Tories

17 December 2012

9:15 AM

17 December 2012

9:15 AM

There’s nothing wrong with Nick Clegg putting some distance between his party and the Conservatives. Today the Liberal Democrat leader is going to open up about the gory details of government, explaining where his party has held the Tories back, and heralding a new era where he and colleagues are honest about what they actually think of policies. On Friday, I argued that this sort of honesty about the workings of coalition government was a good thing. But there is one caveat to this.

Conservative MPs are pretty unhappy at present, and it’s not just that they are overtired before the Christmas break. Their unhappiness stems partly from the splits crisscrossing their party, but also from a disconnect with the Tory leadership and a yearning for certain policies which coalition seems to be blocking. Nick Clegg may have his own Tumblr dedicated to him looking sad, but that doesn’t mean he’s the only leader who should worry about the effects of coalition on those who sit on the backbenches, or those grassroots members who, rather than carrying a ministerial red box, are still carrying campaign leaflets and shoving them through letterboxes.

[Alt-Text]


If Clegg thinks setting out separate positions from the Conservatives is helpful to his party, the Tories can’t just watch him set up a new phase of the Coalition himself. Being honest about the differences between the two parties is a mature way of conducting two-party government, but the Conservatives need to be honest about gory government as well as the Lib Dems.

It’s not just that Cameron would gain electorally from being clear that he would like to go further than the Lib Dems on welfare, immigration and European policy. But he would also make gains with his own MPs, some of whom are suspicious that he quite likes Coalition because it means he can ignore the likes of Peter Bone. If the two parties are going to set out their store ahead of policies making their way into legislation, then both should gain, not just the Lib Dems. The Prime Minister made a speech in the summer calling for benefit cuts to under-25s which were then blocked by the Lib Dems: his Europe speech needs to set out a Conservative rather than Coalition position, too.

The problem of doing too much differentiation is that voters might start to think that the government isn’t achieving anything because the two parties are disagreeing. But Clegg’s former adviser Richard Reeves says the need for this separation strategy is so great that if it fails, ‘the curtain will probably fall on the coalition before 2015’. Oddly enough, I heard that a Conservative whip had been saying something similar recently: apparently one MP with a chance of a ministerial post was told to behave themselves and not stick their head above the parapet too much and then when things fell apart in 2014, there would be government jobs for those who deserved them. Now this sounds more like a whip saying anything to keep a naughty brood in check, but if we’re going to hear more about the gory details of government, perhaps we’ll start to learn what the exit strategy might look like for the Coalition, too.

Give something clever this Christmas – a year’s subscription to The Spectator for just £75. And we’ll give you a free bottle of champagne. Click here.


Show comments
Close