X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

Airports review is doomed to gather dust, British Airways chief warns MPs

4 December 2012

9:39 PM

4 December 2012

9:39 PM

The government’s airports review will simply end up on a shelf, and major airlines will still be operating from a two-runway airport at Heathrow in 2050. That was the stark warning delivered by the chief executive of British Airways’ parent company IAG Willie Walsh this afternoon as he gave evidence to the Transport Select Committee. Walsh told the MPs on the committee:

‘I think the decision of the government to establish the Davies commission has been seen by some as a step in the right direction. I think personally I’m not optimistic… My own view is that the issue is too difficult for politicians and governments to deal with and I’m not optimistic that anything will change in the foreseeable future and as a result of that we’re planning our business on the basis that there will be no change to the capacity of the airports that we operate at in London and have made decisions based on that assessment so I’m an interested observer at this stage.’

He added that ‘in 2050, if we want to take that as along British Airways will be operating from a 2-runway airport at Heathrow.’ He told the committee that ‘from a political point of view, as an observer, I see no evidence of support… I can’t see how you take the report and do anything other than put it on the shelf’. The problem, he said, was ‘fear on the part of politicians: I think they are afraid to tackle tough issues’. He’s not far wrong with that: the Davies Commission’s timetable to report back after the 2015 election shows just how afraid politicians are about its recommendations.

[Alt-Text]


Walsh’s whole evidence session wasn’t very encouraging: not least because he seems determined that if any airport is going to expand, it should be Heathrow. He dismissed the idea that Gatwick could build a second runway, saying he wasn’t aware that the airport authorities had approached the airlines operating from its current runway to see if they would actually want another one. Walsh certainly doesn’t. ‘I don’t see a business case to build a second runway at Gatwick,’ he said.

But he believes that demand for flights to and from Heathrow will continue to grow, and because the only way we’ll get growth at Heathrow now is by increasing the size of aircraft’, BA is looking to use larger planes so that it can carry more passengers with each flight. But because the debate was currently about how to constrain the west London airport rather than expand it, the ‘UK economy will still suffer as a result of the lack of capacity’.

The committee – those MPs who had actually turned up, at least – were all rather dispirited by the session. Kwasi Kwarteng described some of the points Walsh was making as ‘disturbing’.  Those points also sounded pretty plausible, given the amount of opposition within the Conservative party to Heathrow expansion, and the energy that Boris Johnson has been pouring in to his campaign against a third runway.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close