Wise gamblers could do worse than to place a hefty bet every time Ken Clarke expresses an opinion that he’ll have to clarify it shortly afterwards. The minister without portfolio said at a Policy Exchange event this morning that it would be ‘absurd’ for Britain to go to Brussels intending to veto the EU budget. He said:
‘It’s absolutely ludicrous to go there intending to veto. It’s just absurd.
‘Every one of the 27 member states has a veto. What they’ve got to do is reach a negotiated situation. Of course people have a veto. Any government will veto if it goes too far in one direction or the other.’
And a little later, he duly clarified his remarks:
‘The clear meaning of what I said was that we cannot go intending to exercise a veto before we actually arrive. But we have an undoubted right to exercise a veto if we cannot negotiate a satisfactory conclusion.’
Clarke makes the same point as Angela Merkel did when she threatened to cancel the summit because of the veto threat: that there wouldn’t be any point in holding the summit if David Cameron plans to veto any deal on the table other than a real-terms freeze. Downing Street has been preparing the ground for a veto moment, which Cameron knows will be good for his own standing, by describing the demand for a freeze as ‘challenging’. While he’s not travelling to Brussels in a few weeks’ time intending to apply the veto from the outset, it’s the most likely outcome.
More Spectator for less. Stay informed leading up to the EU referendum and in the aftermath. Subscribe and receive 15 issues delivered for just £15, with full web and app access. Join us.