X

Create an account to continue reading.

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles
For unlimited access to The Spectator, subscribe below

Registered readers have access to our blogs and a limited number of magazine articles

Sign in to continue

Already have an account?

What's my subscriber number?

Subscribe now from £1 a week

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
 
View subscription offers

Already a subscriber?

or

Subscribe now for unlimited access

ALL FROM JUST £1 A WEEK

View subscription offers

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Login

Don't have an account? Sign up
X

Subscription expired

Your subscription has expired. Please go to My Account to renew it or view subscription offers.

X

Forgot Password

Please check your email

If the email address you entered is associated with a web account on our system, you will receive an email from us with instructions for resetting your password.

If you don't receive this email, please check your junk mail folder.

X

It's time to subscribe.

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access – from just £1 a week

You've read all your free Spectator magazine articles for this month.

Subscribe now for unlimited access

Online

Unlimited access to The Spectator including the full archive from 1828

Print

Weekly delivery of the magazine

App

Phone & tablet edition of the magazine

Spectator Club

Subscriber-only offers, events and discounts
X

Sign up

What's my subscriber number? Already have an account?

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

Thank you for creating an account – Your subscriber number was not recognised though. To link your subscription visit the My Account page

Thank you for creating your account – To update your details click here to manage your account

X

Your subscriber number is the 8 digit number printed above your name on the address sheet sent with your magazine each week.

Entering your subscriber number will enable full access to all magazine articles on the site.

If you cannot find your subscriber number then please contact us on customerhelp@subscriptions.co.uk or call 0330 333 0050.

You can create an account in the meantime and link your subscription at a later time. Simply visit the My Account page, enter your subscriber number in the relevant field and click 'submit changes'.

Please note: Previously subscribers used a 'WebID' to log into the website. Your subscriber number is not the same as the WebID. Please ensure you use the subscriber number when you link your subscription.

Coffee House

118 Tory MPs publicly reject gay marriage plans

24 November 2012

9:52 AM

24 November 2012

9:52 AM

David Cameron is planning to fast-track legislation for gay civil marriage through parliament, but today’s Daily Mail underlines that his own MPs are dragging their feet over the legislation. The paper reports that at least 118 Tory MPs have expressed their opposition to the plans in letters to constituents or interviews with journalists, and they’re not just the usual suspects that Nick Clegg might accidentally label ‘bigots’. They include openly gay Conor Burns, who told his local newspaper that ‘I marvel at why we’re bringing this forward. There is no clamour for this at all within the gay community’. Wirral West MP and minister for Disabled People, Esther McVey, holds similar views, telling a constituent in a letter that she’s ‘concerned that re-defining marriage is unnecessary given the established legal rights’.

There are other Conservative MPs who are completely torn about the issue. I know of one who has asked his staff – one an evangelical Christian opposed to gay marriage and the other an agnostic in favour – to write briefings from their own perspectives to help him make up his mind.

[Alt-Text]


Liam Fox hit the nail on the head at the Conservative party conference when he was pressed at a fringe event by a group of vehement campaigners from the Church Society to persuade the PM to drop any reference to gay marriage in his conference speech. Those asking the questions appeared to think Fox was as opposed to the legislation as they, but when it came to his answers, he shrugged as he said he didn’t actually hold a strong view either way, but that he wished there was a more respectful debate on the issue from both sides.

This legislation was borne out of the PM’s desire to detoxify his party rather than because of a deluge of demands from the gay community: Stonewall itself suffered from bitter internal splits over whether to campaign for gay marriage. But inevitably the push to remove the ban on same-sex marriages has polarised the issue and led to a war of words between those who hold a firm view, with a large group of ambivalents caught in the crossfire.

The problem for the Tories is that this proposed legislation has brought those firmly opposed to gay marriage such as Peter Bone – who said he wanted to ‘throw up’ when listening to Cameron’s speech endorsing the change – to the fore, which doesn’t exactly help the grand aim of detoxifying the party.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get more Spectator for less – just £12 for 12 issues.


Show comments
Close